Review of The Zodiac Revisited, Volume 1
Posted: 01 Dec 2021, 14:29
[Following is an official OnlineBookClub.org review of "The Zodiac Revisited, Volume 1" by Michael F. Cole.]
In December 1968, a young couple were forced from their car and shot and killed near Benicia, California. Following that murder, until October 1969, the killer took three more lives and seriously injured two others. During and after the murders, the killer wrote multiple letters to newspapers. He soon became known as the Zodiac. In Michael F. Cole’s The Zodiac Revisited, Volume 1, Cole lays out all the facts of the Zodiac case. From the details of his crimes, including ones that are not proven but strongly believed to have been committed by the Zodiac, to the letters he wrote.
As the first in a trilogy, this book gives all the details of the case before getting into speculation and the author’s own thoughts and opinions in the next two books. Although there were a few instances where Cole does theorize about the possible the meanings of some actions. Since this book mostly sticks to the facts, it is a good option for someone who just wants to learn about the Zodiac case.
My favorite thing about this book was the overall writing style and tone. It was detailed and thorough enough to draw me in but not so detailed that the pace dragged. And the author’s tone throughout the book was passionate but also respectful to the victims. I could tell how much time and effort was put into researching the case and writing this book.
The book was very well organized. The events are mostly chronological. The only chapters that were not made sense and fit where they were placed. And there is a good, clear flow from chapter to chapter and between the sections in each chapter.
The only thing I didn’t like about this book was the placement of some of the images of the Zodiac’s letters. Many of them took up an entire page and interfered with the paragraph that started on the previous page and ended in the middle of a sentence. I then had to skip past the picture to be able to finish it. This messed up the flow of the text. This could be easily fixed by having the paragraph start on the page after the image.
Overall, I thought this was a wonderfully written book about the Zodiac that I recommend to true crime fans and anyone interested in the Zodiac case. It was exceptionally well-edited. In fact, I did not find any editing mistakes. The issue with the placement of the images was fairly minor because I quickly came to expect it. Therefore, I am happy to give this book 4 out of 4 stars.
******
The Zodiac Revisited, Volume 1
View: on Bookshelves | on Amazon
In December 1968, a young couple were forced from their car and shot and killed near Benicia, California. Following that murder, until October 1969, the killer took three more lives and seriously injured two others. During and after the murders, the killer wrote multiple letters to newspapers. He soon became known as the Zodiac. In Michael F. Cole’s The Zodiac Revisited, Volume 1, Cole lays out all the facts of the Zodiac case. From the details of his crimes, including ones that are not proven but strongly believed to have been committed by the Zodiac, to the letters he wrote.
As the first in a trilogy, this book gives all the details of the case before getting into speculation and the author’s own thoughts and opinions in the next two books. Although there were a few instances where Cole does theorize about the possible the meanings of some actions. Since this book mostly sticks to the facts, it is a good option for someone who just wants to learn about the Zodiac case.
My favorite thing about this book was the overall writing style and tone. It was detailed and thorough enough to draw me in but not so detailed that the pace dragged. And the author’s tone throughout the book was passionate but also respectful to the victims. I could tell how much time and effort was put into researching the case and writing this book.
The book was very well organized. The events are mostly chronological. The only chapters that were not made sense and fit where they were placed. And there is a good, clear flow from chapter to chapter and between the sections in each chapter.
The only thing I didn’t like about this book was the placement of some of the images of the Zodiac’s letters. Many of them took up an entire page and interfered with the paragraph that started on the previous page and ended in the middle of a sentence. I then had to skip past the picture to be able to finish it. This messed up the flow of the text. This could be easily fixed by having the paragraph start on the page after the image.
Overall, I thought this was a wonderfully written book about the Zodiac that I recommend to true crime fans and anyone interested in the Zodiac case. It was exceptionally well-edited. In fact, I did not find any editing mistakes. The issue with the placement of the images was fairly minor because I quickly came to expect it. Therefore, I am happy to give this book 4 out of 4 stars.
******
The Zodiac Revisited, Volume 1
View: on Bookshelves | on Amazon