- Posts: 58
- Joined: 04 Nov 2011, 09:38
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Well...I did enjoy his writing style immensely and the storyline intrigued me. But when I finished it, the whole thing seemed so pointless to me. The references to his former works were a nice touch, as I stopped reading his books 15 years ago, I don't know if I got all of them. I just got enough to have my Derry nightmares return
So all in all this book reminded me of Kings craftsmenship and his insight into mankinds psychologie, but as long as he doesn't write childrensbooks, I will not read one more of his books. I am just not cut out for it
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 296
- Joined: 13 Apr 2015, 12:49
- 2017 Reading Goal: 50
- 2017 Reading Goal Completion: 70
- Currently Reading: A Book for Oreo
- Bookshelf Size: 234
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-momlovesbooks.html
- Latest Review: America River: Confluence by Mallory M. O'Connor
- David Bowman
- Posts: 44
- Joined: 23 Apr 2015, 14:12
- Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... Ulysses</a>
- Currently Reading: Echo
- Bookshelf Size: 28
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-david-bowman.html
- Latest Review: "Earth Angel" by Alex Apostol
For the beginning parts of 11/22/63, I enjoyed the opening and the thought of a diner holding this secret time travel portal to go back to the year 1958. Alternate histories and storylines are always interesting in my view, so I was on hold for most of the time. The scene at Halloween brought in some nostalgia (especially it taking place in the '50s!).
However, I did not like the politics and multiple subplots during the middle of the book. One of the major problems had to deal with King's view of politics. From the way it was portrayed (rather directly, in my opinion), all I felt was not an author's insight into a subject but rather the author butting into the story to give his opinion on the subject matter. This happens multiple times and really irked me. Aside from that, one issue is the pacing of the story during the middle of the book. It slows down painfully and does not, in my opinion, help with the story. This doesn't mean that the details concerning Oswald's motives and information weren't important, but that there was too much of it for me to attain the same attention as was before.
I liked the ending (very bittersweet) and didn't think the book was that bad (there are worse King books out there). I rated it a 2.5.
I had read the original ending to 11/22/63 somewhere online (can't remember where it was at the moment) and didn't like it. King's original version took the miserable ending of the alternate history that occurred when Jake went from 1958 and back into 2012. Even though his son came up with the ending and not him, the original author, I appreciated the second, newer one better.lolis wrote:He mentions that his son came up with the ending, I'm still wondering about the first ending!
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 19 Oct 2018, 06:15
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 0