The reason for some proper English grammar rules

Some grammar rules (and embarrassing mistakes!) transcend the uniqueness of different regions and style guides. This new International Grammar section by OnlineBookClub.org ultimately identifies those rules thus providing a simple, flexible rule-set, respecting the differences between regions and style guides. You can feel free to ask general questions about spelling and grammar. You can also provide example sentences for other members to proofread and inform you of any grammar mistakes.

Moderator: Official Reviewer Representatives

Post Reply
User avatar
khusnick
Posts: 82
Joined: 25 May 2017, 17:20
Currently Reading: Atlas Shrugged
Bookshelf Size: 30
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-khusnick.html
Latest Review: The Elf Coup - Book Three of the Magi Charter by Jordan David

The reason for some proper English grammar rules

Post by khusnick »

I learned something new in an English traditional grammar course that I felt like sharing with everyone.

A lot of our proper grammar rules, such as not ending a sentence with a preposition, have no real reasons aside from a scholar in the 1600's deciding that English should be more like Latin. So even though we have the ability to do things like splitting infinitives, it became a rule that we shouldn't do that because infinitives are one word in Latin and cannot be split.

Some of the rules sound really weird because with the way English is naturally structured, the rules don't make much sense. They started because someone wrote a book to make English grammar more like Latin's grammar, and we have been following some of these rules against our natural language instincts essentially just because of that.

All information on this came from my professor who has a PhD in linguistics, but if you know more about this or have information that disagrees, please feel to add!
User avatar
clairedonne
Posts: 4
Joined: 28 Feb 2018, 18:26
Currently Reading: The Second Cup
Bookshelf Size: 13

Post by clairedonne »

I tried Grammarly on my computer to see what my english was like and it told me I couldnt end sentences with "to". Is that what you mean by preposition? sorry, dont know the term.
User avatar
khusnick
Posts: 82
Joined: 25 May 2017, 17:20
Currently Reading: Atlas Shrugged
Bookshelf Size: 30
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-khusnick.html
Latest Review: The Elf Coup - Book Three of the Magi Charter by Jordan David

Post by khusnick »

Yes, that would be a preposition. Word such as to, about, in, and beneath are all prepositions. There are a lot of them.
Cate winslet
Posts: 68
Joined: 22 Jun 2017, 15:46
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 10

Post by Cate winslet »

I leant that the is a big problem on where to place a comma and a full stop. Also apostrophe.
User avatar
khusnick
Posts: 82
Joined: 25 May 2017, 17:20
Currently Reading: Atlas Shrugged
Bookshelf Size: 30
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-khusnick.html
Latest Review: The Elf Coup - Book Three of the Magi Charter by Jordan David

Post by khusnick »

I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
User avatar
Penchick007
Posts: 2
Joined: 20 Feb 2018, 07:41
Bookshelf Size: 0

Post by Penchick007 »

Thank you for this information. Within my various English classes, this particular subject was never addressed. Now I'm curious to see if these archaic rules will be broken, and we can apply what was once a 'no-no, to be acceptable grammar. Will be watching for trends as new best sellers come off the press.
User avatar
khusnick
Posts: 82
Joined: 25 May 2017, 17:20
Currently Reading: Atlas Shrugged
Bookshelf Size: 30
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-khusnick.html
Latest Review: The Elf Coup - Book Three of the Magi Charter by Jordan David

Post by khusnick »

Interestingly enough, the change of those rules have actually been something I've had the opportunity to discuss in that class. My professor says those rules are often broken in our speech because they are not natural to our language, and in often cases, you will see the most awkward rules broken in books.

Take the example of not ending a sentence with a preposition. We do that all the time. No one is going to write "About what are you talking?" nowadays. For any native English speaker, it will be "What are you talking about?"

She mentioned the use of "whom" is another grammar rule that is on its way out, at least to the full extent it is supposed to be used. If I hear of any other examples, I can share in the future as well.
Nicola Bigwood
Posts: 10
Joined: 12 Jan 2018, 13:54
Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... Assassin's Fate (Fitz and the Fool #3)</a>
Currently Reading: Britain By the Book
Bookshelf Size: 37
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-nicola-bigwood.html
Latest Review: The Elf Brief by Jordan David

Post by Nicola Bigwood »

Cate winslet wrote: 01 Mar 2018, 12:44 I leant that the is a big problem on where to place a comma and a full stop. Also apostrophe.
There are differences between British and American usage, which can cause confusion, but otherwise it should be fairly straight forward! There's a lot of info on correct punctuation on "http://en.oxforddictionaries. com/grammar/punctuation" (I can't post the URL - remove the space before .com and it should work :) )

Hope that helps!
Post Reply

Return to “International Grammar”