Is "-ise" an error to be penalised? (or "penalized!?")
Moderator: Official Reviewer Representatives
- Shirazi Cat
- Posts: 53
- Joined: 27 Sep 2017, 13:39
- Bookshelf Size: 4
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-shirazi-cat.html
- Latest Review: "Puffy and the Formidable Foe" by Marie Lepkowski and Ann Marie Hannon
Is "-ise" an error to be penalised? (or "penalized!?")
I see there is already a thread on American vs British English, but as my own question is more immediate and, shall we say, practical, I think it may deserve a separate hearing. (By the way, I hope I am not breaking any rules by bringing this up here! If so, please specify amount of hail marys required for atonement - and I'm not even Catholic!)
In any case, here is a short excerpt from the latest editor score sheet I received for a review of mine: "Spelling errors: 'instalments' should be 'installments,' 'categorise' should be 'categorize,' 'organisation' should be 'organization,' and 'favourite' should be 'favorite.' "
Now, it so happens that I studied in Britain and I can assure you that over there one "organises" much more than one "organizes" and that "instalments" are generally "favoured" over "installments" - not that anyone will complain as long as you pay! So, for me, "-ising" rather than "-izing", and so on, is something of a habit. I can appreciate that this is an American site, but does this make British spelling wrong? It's not just because I happened to lose a few points that I'm asking. After all, now I will know what to do in the future (supposing there is one for me! ) But if this is a real factor, should it not, for example, be mentioned somewhere in the guidelines?
Anyhow, I would like to know what other people think about this, for it could be that I am just being unreasonable. Thanks.
- MrsCatInTheHat
- Posts: 3817
- Joined: 31 May 2016, 11:53
- Favorite Book: Cry the Beloved Country
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 376
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-mrscatinthehat.html
- Latest Review: Marc Marci by Larry G. Goldsmith
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Publishing Contest Votes: 0
- RegularGuy3
- Posts: 293
- Joined: 08 Jul 2017, 10:50
- Currently Reading: All the Light We Cannot See
- Bookshelf Size: 15
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-regularguy3.html
- Latest Review: Farmer Beau's Farm by Kathleen Geiger
- Shirazi Cat
- Posts: 53
- Joined: 27 Sep 2017, 13:39
- Bookshelf Size: 4
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-shirazi-cat.html
- Latest Review: "Puffy and the Formidable Foe" by Marie Lepkowski and Ann Marie Hannon
1) "I wouldn't have a clue, as an editor, that most of what you mentioned above, is correct in Britain."
My dear fellow cat, what can I say to that? Try googling "organise vs organize" (or any other of the opposed couples for that matter) and see what comes up. I believe it won't be vastly different to what I am telling you.
2) "Yes, I would consider those spellings wrong for purposes of a review--even if I wouldn't consider them wrong if they were in a book."
Why for heaven's sake? Why should we judge spelling differently depending on whether it occurs in a book or a review?
Thanks again guys, I really appreciate your taking the time to respond!
- Gingerbo0ks
- Posts: 735
- Joined: 19 Mar 2017, 13:59
- Currently Reading: All the Crooked Saints
- Bookshelf Size: 168
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-gingerbo0ks.html
- Latest Review: "Strong Heart" by Charlie Sheldon
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
That's interesting to hear. I've used British English in the past and haven't lost points.CatInTheHat wrote:I do edit reviews based on American English standards. In your position, I'd make sure that your proofreading app is set to American English. I know you can do this setting in Grammarly and in Word. I wouldn't have a clue, as an editor, that most of what you mentioned above, is correct in Britain.
Edit; Going back to original post, in my opinion surely it shouldn't matter if it's obvious that the word is correctly spelt regardless. Eg; color/colour, organise/organize
― Cassandra Clare, Clockwork Angel
- Shirazi Cat
- Posts: 53
- Joined: 27 Sep 2017, 13:39
- Bookshelf Size: 4
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-shirazi-cat.html
- Latest Review: "Puffy and the Formidable Foe" by Marie Lepkowski and Ann Marie Hannon
Hi there,
Well, I am quoting from the editor's scorecard and, as you see, "instalments" and so on are listed as errors. So I have to assume that a penalty has been imposed. As for the post you are quoting, I am rather at a loss, as my own answer indicates, regarding this editor's frank admission that, "as an editor" he "wouldn't have a clue" that there exists such a thing as British spelling!
It's interesting to hear your own experience, which brings me back to the question that made me create this post: is British spelling disallowed here? Whether it is or isn't, shouldn't that be the case across the board, rather than depending on each editor's personal opinions and preferences? If it is disallowed, shouldn't that be made clear in the guidelines?
Thank you for responding.
-
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 1444
- Joined: 03 Sep 2016, 15:34
- Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 665">Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban</a>
- Currently Reading: The Family Upstairs
- Bookshelf Size: 435
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-marisarose.html
- Latest Review: The Magic Shard by eelonqa K harris
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Shirazi Cat
- Posts: 53
- Joined: 27 Sep 2017, 13:39
- Bookshelf Size: 4
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-shirazi-cat.html
- Latest Review: "Puffy and the Formidable Foe" by Marie Lepkowski and Ann Marie Hannon
It's good to hear this about your editorial practice. As for the whole question not being broached in the guidelines, I know it and agree with you, which should be clear from the comment I posted almost simultaneously with you! Thanks again.
-
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 1444
- Joined: 03 Sep 2016, 15:34
- Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 665">Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban</a>
- Currently Reading: The Family Upstairs
- Bookshelf Size: 435
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-marisarose.html
- Latest Review: The Magic Shard by eelonqa K harris
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
No problem. I do think Scott will rectify your editorial score for that review once you contact him. It wouldn’t be fair to only edit based on American English. What if a reviewer reaches Level 6 and is able to do edits but happens to have studied somewhere other than the United States? I think editors should take the time to do a quick google search if they are unsure of something (I have done this before, it’s very quick, easy and useful). Hope this doesn’t happen again. Good luck.Shirazi Cat wrote:Thank you Marisa
It's good to hear this about your editorial practice. As for the whole question not being broached in the guidelines, I know it and agree with you, which should be clear from the comment I posted almost simultaneously with you! Thanks again.
- Shirazi Cat
- Posts: 53
- Joined: 27 Sep 2017, 13:39
- Bookshelf Size: 4
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-shirazi-cat.html
- Latest Review: "Puffy and the Formidable Foe" by Marie Lepkowski and Ann Marie Hannon
Exactly! I mean, there were editors before the internet and they did a good job back then too, if they cared to. But for such issues to arise in this day and age, with google seconds away from one's fingertips, doesn't make sense. Frankly, I think it's more important that the situation itself, rather than my own score, be rectified, as you say. After all, I can (and I guess i will have to) use the American norm. But, even without point reduction, it is bad form to be "corrected" when there is no correction, really, to be made.
- PashaRu
- Posts: 9174
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 17:02
- Currently Reading: Vicars of Christ - The Dark Side of the Papacy
- Bookshelf Size: 191
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-pasharu.html
- Latest Review: "Damn Females on the Lawn" by Rachel Hurd
- MrsCatInTheHat
- Posts: 3817
- Joined: 31 May 2016, 11:53
- Favorite Book: Cry the Beloved Country
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 376
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-mrscatinthehat.html
- Latest Review: Marc Marci by Larry G. Goldsmith
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Publishing Contest Votes: 0
Hi there,
Well, I am quoting from the editor's scorecard and, as you see, "instalments" and so on are listed as errors. So I have to assume that a penalty has been imposed. As for the post you are quoting, I am rather at a loss, as my own answer indicates, regarding this editor's frank admission that, "as an editor" he "wouldn't have a clue" that there exists such a thing as British spelling.]
I did not say that I did not know there is such a thing as British spelling. I know the obvious ones. I do not assume that incorrect spellings in American English are correct in another version of English for,less obvious ones.
- Shirazi Cat
- Posts: 53
- Joined: 27 Sep 2017, 13:39
- Bookshelf Size: 4
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-shirazi-cat.html
- Latest Review: "Puffy and the Formidable Foe" by Marie Lepkowski and Ann Marie Hannon
Then I guess the question is what you consider to be "obvious". To me "-ise" as opposed to "-ize" and "-our" as opposed to "-or" are the most obvious differences between British and American spelling. And, indeed, "organisation" and "favourite" are two of the three instances of British spelling "corrected" by the editor, and mentioned in my original post. So, when you wrote that "most" of what I mentioned in that post you wouldn't have a clue is correct in Britain, what was it that you were referring to?
- PashaRu
- Posts: 9174
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 17:02
- Currently Reading: Vicars of Christ - The Dark Side of the Papacy
- Bookshelf Size: 191
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-pasharu.html
- Latest Review: "Damn Females on the Lawn" by Rachel Hurd
I'd have to agree with this. Editors can't be marking things as "mistakes" that aren't really mistakes. It calls into question the entire editing process and, subsequently, reviewer scores.Shirazi Cat wrote:As for the post you are quoting, I am rather at a loss, as my own answer indicates, regarding this editor's frank admission that, "as an editor" he "wouldn't have a clue" that there exists such a thing as British spelling!
- gali
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 53653
- Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 07:12
- Currently Reading: Pride and Prejudice in Space
- Bookshelf Size: 2288
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-gali.html
- Reading Device: B00I15SB16
- Publishing Contest Votes: 0
@"Shirazi Cat", if you have issues about your score, you should privately contact Scott about it and not discuss it here. This is not the purpose of this forum.
Pronouns: She/Her
"In the case of good books, the point is not to see how many of them you can get through, but rather how many can get through to you." (Mortimer J. Adler)