Panick Attacks for first reviews?
Moderator: Official Reviewer Representatives
- hkachelmeier
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 18 Jan 2016, 19:21
- Currently Reading: The Sound of Our Steps
- Bookshelf Size: 1104
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-hkachelmeier.html
Re: Panick Attacks for first reviews?
- moderntimes
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 13:03
- Favorite Book: Ulysses by James Joyce
- Currently Reading: Grendel by John Gardner
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Anki_Real_Reviews
- Posts: 168
- Joined: 03 Oct 2015, 12:06
- Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 55282">The Palace of Illusions</a>
- Currently Reading: 2 books same content: You'll Do Anything for Him. You'll Do Anything for Her
- Bookshelf Size: 82
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-anki-real-reviews.html
- Latest Review: The Engine Woman's Light by Laurel Anne Hill
- Reading Device: B00LHLASDU
All said and done, I am not an expert. I am trying to learn, though. Good luck in your quest to success.
- moderntimes
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 13:03
- Favorite Book: Ulysses by James Joyce
- Currently Reading: Grendel by John Gardner
- Bookshelf Size: 0
But, and I am saying this with the kindest criticism, is it possible that your reviews are a bit too "amateurish", Anki, and this is the reason they are being rejected (I don't know to whom you are submitting them)?
By "amateurish" I mean what a joking call "high school" reviews. These are the sort of reviews which "gush" about a liked book, overuse of "wonderful" and "glorious" adjectives without saying WHY the book is good.
This sort of review also seems to follow a standardized path: The review summarized the plot, then says that the reviewer liked or disliked the book. But it never says WHY in any detail which helps the prospective purchaser decide.
And there are other aspects to a review than just the plot, and "high school" amateurish reviews only seem to mention the plot. But a book has style, coherent narrative, dialogue which is realistic and meaningful, a rhythm which provides exciting sections and then more sedate expository sections, a feel for the language, all sorts of things which make up a good (or bad) novel besides the plot.
So a good review should point out all the aspects of a book, not just the plot, which lets review readers decide better whether to buy the book. For example, the plot may be a bit thin or tenuous, but the dialogues may be smart and brilliant, the descriptions of scenes and person in the novel be sharp and intelligent, and so on.
So for a newbie reviewer, from someone with 120+ reviews, I recommend 1) ensure that there are zero mechanical and grammatical errors, and 2) write a fully and entertaining review, one that's a sort of "essay" on the book, that discusses ALL the aspects, both good and bad, of the novel under review. Imagine you're telling a friend about the book, discussing that the dialogue was fun to read, the story line sagged a bit but the descriptions of the scenery and characters was very entertaining, etc.
And good luck!
- Anki_Real_Reviews
- Posts: 168
- Joined: 03 Oct 2015, 12:06
- Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 55282">The Palace of Illusions</a>
- Currently Reading: 2 books same content: You'll Do Anything for Him. You'll Do Anything for Her
- Bookshelf Size: 82
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-anki-real-reviews.html
- Latest Review: The Engine Woman's Light by Laurel Anne Hill
- Reading Device: B00LHLASDU
Thanks moderntimes! I really appreciate your detailed advice. I shall keep it in mind.moderntimes wrote:First of all, yes, your reviews, just like all other writing which you submit, must be perfect, clean and free from errors of any kind. Some may accept a minor glitch but it behooves the author to ensure that there are zero mechanical and grammatical errors.
But, and I am saying this with the kindest criticism, is it possible that your reviews are a bit too "amateurish", Anki, and this is the reason they are being rejected (I don't know to whom you are submitting them)?
By "amateurish" I mean what a joking call "high school" reviews. These are the sort of reviews which "gush" about a liked book, overuse of "wonderful" and "glorious" adjectives without saying WHY the book is good.
This sort of review also seems to follow a standardized path: The review summarized the plot, then says that the reviewer liked or disliked the book. But it never says WHY in any detail which helps the prospective purchaser decide.
And there are other aspects to a review than just the plot, and "high school" amateurish reviews only seem to mention the plot. But a book has style, coherent narrative, dialogue which is realistic and meaningful, a rhythm which provides exciting sections and then more sedate expository sections, a feel for the language, all sorts of things which make up a good (or bad) novel besides the plot.
So a good review should point out all the aspects of a book, not just the plot, which lets review readers decide better whether to buy the book. For example, the plot may be a bit thin or tenuous, but the dialogues may be smart and brilliant, the descriptions of scenes and person in the novel be sharp and intelligent, and so on.
So for a newbie reviewer, from someone with 120+ reviews, I recommend 1) ensure that there are zero mechanical and grammatical errors, and 2) write a fully and entertaining review, one that's a sort of "essay" on the book, that discusses ALL the aspects, both good and bad, of the novel under review. Imagine you're telling a friend about the book, discussing that the dialogue was fun to read, the story line sagged a bit but the descriptions of the scenery and characters was very entertaining, etc.
And good luck!
- charysma_lilly
- Posts: 92
- Joined: 02 Jan 2014, 14:40
- Currently Reading: Before I Fall
- Bookshelf Size: 20
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-charysma-lilly.html
- moderntimes
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 13:03
- Favorite Book: Ulysses by James Joyce
- Currently Reading: Grendel by John Gardner
- Bookshelf Size: 0
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 03 Sep 2015, 07:02
- Bookshelf Size: 430
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-joyreader.html
- Latest Review: "The Banned Book about Love" by Scott Hughes
Agreedrssllue wrote:I think the biggest thing to remember, is that there are people on here that will help you to improve with every review you write. The comments that they give have helped me to see where I can improve my subsequent review each and every time. They take the time to help us see where we can shore up some weaknesses, but also give encouragement in our strengths. Just like anything else, you will get better with practice, so just start writing them and go from there! Don't forget to have fun too! You are doing the author a great service by reviewing their book. It is very cool!
- Paliden
- Posts: 454
- Joined: 17 Sep 2013, 15:38
- Currently Reading: White Cargo
- Bookshelf Size: 1028
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-paliden.html
- Latest Review: "Justified Anger" by Jennifer Colne
- moderntimes
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 13:03
- Favorite Book: Ulysses by James Joyce
- Currently Reading: Grendel by John Gardner
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- LiteratureUtopia
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 08 Feb 2016, 15:34
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-literatureutopia.html
- moderntimes
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 13:03
- Favorite Book: Ulysses by James Joyce
- Currently Reading: Grendel by John Gardner
- Bookshelf Size: 0
This afternoon I wrote my most recent review, a mystery "Pretty Girls" by the well known author Karin Slaughter. As I read the book, I was making mental notes and so when I started the review, it came quickly. That's what practice gets you. I've got about 150+ reviews under my belt now.
Nevertheless, I try to make each review different. I don't just summarize the plot -- that's "high school" (not to demean good young writers). I talk about the story, yes, but the character development, the themes that the author puts forth, the book's rhythm and how English is used to set tones and so forth.
I try to write my review as if I were describing the book to a friend.
- Goms
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 18 Feb 2016, 03:49
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-goms.html
I guess it happens to all new writers. The fear of not doing a good job comes to us all. I'd say that you just write down what you have in mind, I mean what you think of the book, maybe go online to polish your punctuation skills. Please spellcheck your work before submitting and you are good to go. Remember 'practise makes perfect' and 'Rome was not built in a day.'
So don't expect to be an instant pro, but you will get better with time. I have just come out of my own 'jitters stage.'
Cheers
- moderntimes
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 13:03
- Favorite Book: Ulysses by James Joyce
- Currently Reading: Grendel by John Gardner
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Booky_BettyC
- Posts: 208
- Joined: 28 Feb 2016, 18:39
- Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 55482">Hex Hall</a>
- Bookshelf Size: 39
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-booky-bettyc.html
- Latest Review: "Undead Redhead" by Jen Frankel