What is wrong with these sentences?

Some grammar rules (and embarrassing mistakes!) transcend the uniqueness of different regions and style guides. This new International Grammar section by OnlineBookClub.org ultimately identifies those rules thus providing a simple, flexible rule-set, respecting the differences between regions and style guides. You can feel free to ask general questions about spelling and grammar. You can also provide example sentences for other members to proofread and inform you of any grammar mistakes.

Moderator: Official Reviewer Representatives

Post Reply
Katelyn Short
Posts: 2
Joined: 25 May 2021, 13:52
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 0
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-katelyn-short.html
Latest Review: Waterworks by Jack Winnick

What is wrong with these sentences?

Post by Katelyn Short »

Hey folks! I'm new here, and my first review was marked as having several errors. I'm trying to learn how I can do better, and honestly, I'm not quite sure what I did wrong. Any input is appreciated! Here is what the notes said:

Editor Comments:
1) " They feel more robotic than [human]." [humans]

2) "It's not just that they are so competent - it's more [that] the "bad guys" are pretty incompetent." [than]

3) "The text alternates between highly technical descriptions and simplified, repetitive conversations, and the [book stalls]." [bookstalls]

4) "There was also a lot of talk about killing Americans, and what heroes the Iranians thought() themselves by committing these heinous mass murders." [of themselves]
User avatar
Alice Heritage
Review Team Guidelines Team Leader
Posts: 6574
Joined: 29 Apr 2017, 02:00
Favorite Author: Wilkie Collins
Favorite Book: Wuthering Heights
Currently Reading: 50 Masterpieces of Gothic Fiction
Bookshelf Size: 379
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-alice-heritage.html
Latest Review: Dissonance by Aaron Ryan
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
Publishing Contest Votes: 1
fav_author_id: 1
Signature Addition: Mod

Post by Alice Heritage »

Katelyn Short wrote: 04 Jun 2021, 00:56 Hey folks! I'm new here, and my first review was marked as having several errors. I'm trying to learn how I can do better, and honestly, I'm not quite sure what I did wrong. Any input is appreciated! Here is what the notes said:

Editor Comments:
1) " They feel more robotic than [human]." [humans]

2) "It's not just that they are so competent - it's more [that] the "bad guys" are pretty incompetent." [than]

3) "The text alternates between highly technical descriptions and simplified, repetitive conversations, and the [book stalls]." [bookstalls]

4) "There was also a lot of talk about killing Americans, and what heroes the Iranians thought() themselves by committing these heinous mass murders." [of themselves]
There is nothing wrong with those sentences as you originally wrote them. Those "corrections" are utterly spurious. Please inform the site moderators about this issue using the contact form.
This post was brought to you by the word "specifically".
Mod
User avatar
gali
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 53653
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 07:12
Favorite Author: Agatha Christie
Currently Reading: Pride and Prejudice in Space
Bookshelf Size: 2288
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-gali.html
Reading Device: B00I15SB16
Publishing Contest Votes: 0
fav_author_id: 2484

Post by gali »

ButterscotchCherrie wrote: 06 Jun 2021, 13:02
Katelyn Short wrote: 04 Jun 2021, 00:56 Hey folks! I'm new here, and my first review was marked as having several errors. I'm trying to learn how I can do better, and honestly, I'm not quite sure what I did wrong. Any input is appreciated! Here is what the notes said:

Editor Comments:
1) " They feel more robotic than [human]." [humans]

2) "It's not just that they are so competent - it's more [that] the "bad guys" are pretty incompetent." [than]

3) "The text alternates between highly technical descriptions and simplified, repetitive conversations, and the [book stalls]." [bookstalls]

4) "There was also a lot of talk about killing Americans, and what heroes the Iranians thought() themselves by committing these heinous mass murders." [of themselves]
There is nothing wrong with those sentences as you originally wrote them. Those "corrections" are utterly spurious. Please inform the site moderators about this issue using the contact form.
The member should ask for a recheck via the Review Team Page, not via the Contact form. :tiphat:
A retired Admin/Mod

Pronouns: She/Her

"In the case of good books, the point is not to see how many of them you can get through, but rather how many can get through to you." (Mortimer J. Adler)
User avatar
Alice Heritage
Review Team Guidelines Team Leader
Posts: 6574
Joined: 29 Apr 2017, 02:00
Favorite Author: Wilkie Collins
Favorite Book: Wuthering Heights
Currently Reading: 50 Masterpieces of Gothic Fiction
Bookshelf Size: 379
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-alice-heritage.html
Latest Review: Dissonance by Aaron Ryan
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
Publishing Contest Votes: 1
fav_author_id: 1
Signature Addition: Mod

Post by Alice Heritage »

gali wrote: 06 Jun 2021, 13:30
ButterscotchCherrie wrote: 06 Jun 2021, 13:02
Katelyn Short wrote: 04 Jun 2021, 00:56 Hey folks! I'm new here, and my first review was marked as having several errors. I'm trying to learn how I can do better, and honestly, I'm not quite sure what I did wrong. Any input is appreciated! Here is what the notes said:

Editor Comments:
1) " They feel more robotic than [human]." [humans]

2) "It's not just that they are so competent - it's more [that] the "bad guys" are pretty incompetent." [than]

3) "The text alternates between highly technical descriptions and simplified, repetitive conversations, and the [book stalls]." [bookstalls]

4) "There was also a lot of talk about killing Americans, and what heroes the Iranians thought() themselves by committing these heinous mass murders." [of themselves]
There is nothing wrong with those sentences as you originally wrote them. Those "corrections" are utterly spurious. Please inform the site moderators about this issue using the contact form.
The member should ask for a recheck via the Review Team Page, not via the Contact form. :tiphat:
Yes, of course, but there's a particular need to draw attention to these wildly inaccurate "corrections".
This post was brought to you by the word "specifically".
Mod
User avatar
Nonso Samuelson
Posts: 936
Joined: 27 Mar 2019, 19:01
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 166
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-nonso-samuelson.html
Latest Review: Doctoroo & the Case of the Hacking Hippo by Dr. Rachel B. Wellner

Post by Nonso Samuelson »

Katelyn Short wrote: 04 Jun 2021, 00:56 Hey folks! I'm new here, and my first review was marked as having several errors. I'm trying to learn how I can do better, and honestly, I'm not quite sure what I did wrong. Any input is appreciated! Here is what the notes said:

Editor Comments:
1) " They feel more robotic than [human]." [humans]

2) "It's not just that they are so competent - it's more [that] the "bad guys" are pretty incompetent." [than]

3) "The text alternates between highly technical descriptions and simplified, repetitive conversations, and the [book stalls]." [bookstalls]

4) "There was also a lot of talk about killing Americans, and what heroes the Iranians thought() themselves by committing these heinous mass murders." [of themselves]
Welcome to the OBC platform. I have to say I'm surprised at these errors the editor marked you down for as none of them are credible by any means. You'll need to ask for a recheck.

In the second error pointed out, though, I think your use of a hyphen between "competent" and "it's" is wrong; it should be a dash (—), not a hyphen (-). So there's an error in that one, just not what the editor marked you down for. In any case, you can challenge all four of these but make sure to give credible sources online that support your points.
Apurv Mittal
Posts: 4
Joined: 18 Jun 2021, 21:56
Bookshelf Size: 0

Post by Apurv Mittal »

Jachike Samuelson wrote: 08 Jun 2021, 02:51
Katelyn Short wrote: 04 Jun 2021, 00:56 Hey folks! I'm new here, and my first review was marked as having several errors. I'm trying to learn how I can do better, and honestly, I'm not quite sure what I did wrong. Any input is appreciated! Here is what the notes said:

Editor Comments:
1) " They feel more robotic than [human]." [humans]

2) "It's not just that they are so competent - it's more [that] the "bad guys" are pretty incompetent." [than]

3) "The text alternates between highly technical descriptions and simplified, repetitive conversations, and the [book stalls]." [bookstalls]

4) "There was also a lot of talk about killing Americans, and what heroes the Iranians thought() themselves by committing these heinous mass murders." [of themselves]
Welcome to the OBC platform. I have to say I'm surprised at these errors the editor marked you down for as none of them are credible by any means. You'll need to ask for a recheck.

In the second error pointed out, though, I think your use of a hyphen between "competent" and "it's" is wrong; it should be a dash (—), not a hyphen (-). So there's an error in that one, just not what the editor marked you down for. In any case, you can challenge all four of these but make sure to give credible sources online that support your points.
From your first sentence, it seems that you are saying that "they" feel more ROBOTIC than "they" feel HUMAN.
If that is the case, the correction has missed the point.
Post Reply

Return to “International Grammar”