Government run only by members of Abnegation?
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: 27 Feb 2015, 21:49
- Favorite Book: Twilight and The Last Song
- Currently Reading: Bluewater Walkabout
- Bookshelf Size: 706
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-csimmons032.html
- Latest Review: "Book Blueprint" by Jacqui Pretty
Re: Government run only by members of Abnegation?
- b_clavier27
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 20:40
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Scorsee
- Posts: 217
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 19:22
- Bookshelf Size: 16
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-scorsee.html
- Latest Review: Audible Book of your Choice by Amazon
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: 02 Apr 2015, 02:13
- Currently Reading: The Silent Boy
- Bookshelf Size: 19
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-steinhm.html
- Latest Review: "The Mysterious Bakery On Rue De Paris" by Evie Gaughan
Obviously it didn't work in that case and I don't think it would ever work. There is a reason that Abnegation and the factions ultimately lead to disaster, just like in the Hunger Games, and it's because that style of governing simply just won't work. And it never will.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: 09 Apr 2015, 23:51
- Currently Reading: Gone Girl
- Bookshelf Size: 10
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-missjane.html
Pros: the government being selfless means that theoretically they would do whatever it takes to make the people happy. They will not be corrupt (I repeat, theoretically).
Cons: Not all people are willing to accept the views and decisions of the Abnegation. It is not fair to only have representation from one of the factions; it would be better if each faction was represented in the government. It takes bravery, honesty, intelligence, and selflessness to run a successful, prosperous government. Areas where the Abnegation were weaker, other faction leaders could be stronger. If the Abnegation believed what they were doing was for the "good of the people," they might make bad decisions that lead their people astray unintentionally.
As you can see, the cons outweigh the pros, so I believe that having only Abnegation rule over all the factions was not a good decision.
- Rachaelamb1
- Posts: 986
- Joined: 07 Mar 2015, 01:58
- Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... onwitch</a>
- Currently Reading: Falling Star
- Bookshelf Size: 128
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-rachaelamb1.html
- Latest Review: "Dragon Born" by Ela Lourenco
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 15 Apr 2015, 04:57
- Bookshelf Size: 15
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-abasto123.html
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: 29 Jun 2015, 07:26
- Currently Reading: Pride and Prejudice
- Bookshelf Size: 14
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-meganxxcooper.html
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: 15 Jul 2015, 18:22
- Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 920">Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone</a>
- Currently Reading: Doctor Who: Winner Takes All
- Bookshelf Size: 78
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-hannahbm13.html
- Latest Review: "The Last City of America" by Matthew Tysz
- zjones99
- Posts: 74
- Joined: 16 Jul 2015, 09:09
- Currently Reading: Binge
- Bookshelf Size: 19
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-zjones99.html
- Crimsonsky 749
- Posts: 63
- Joined: 15 Jul 2015, 20:28
- Currently Reading: Artemis fowl
- Bookshelf Size: 18
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-crimsonsky-749.html
- Latest Review: "Salvation's Dawn" by Joe Jackson
I agree with gali. Having all factions in the government can lead to a better decision. You have all the views of all the factions so you can compare to find the best result. It may no be the best for the people, the smartest, the most honest, the kindest or even the most brave choice. However I think it will lead to an equal mixture of all these things. And that would please everyone. Though I can see why they have Abnegation as the government leader as other have said. They wouldn't do anything to further themselves because they are selfless. Therefore the government could never be corrupt. They would also do what is best for the people no matter what. Even if the government loses influence, money, or power.gali wrote:I don't think it is a good idea. I think that all factions should have taken part in the government to balance the picture. The Abnegation were selfless, but it isn't enough for a stabilized and smart government.
Quote unknown.
Stop waiting for Prince Charming. Get out and find him. The poor idiot may be stuck in a tree or something.
Quote unknown.
- Tanaya
- Posts: 801
- Joined: 30 Mar 2015, 13:22
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 89
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-tanaya.html
- Latest Review: Beans...Finding My Way Home by Debi Brown
- The Book Reviewer
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 01 Aug 2015, 17:11
- Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 24175">The Knife of Never Letting Go</a>
- Currently Reading: The Humans
- Bookshelf Size: 18
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-the-book-reviewer.html
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 08 Sep 2015, 20:17
- Currently Reading: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
- Bookshelf Size: 13
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-courtney8847.html
- Aithne
- Posts: 118
- Joined: 11 Nov 2013, 22:42
- Bookshelf Size: 24
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-aithne.html
- Latest Review: "Chains of Mist" by T.C. Metivier