Review of Do We Have A Center?

[Magdalyne chebet]

[Following is an official OnlineBookClub.org review of "Do We Have A Center?" by walter frank.]

---

5 out of 5 stars

---

Share This Review

---

"Do We Have a Center?" by Walter Frank thoughtfully explores and analyzes the 2016 American campaign with a primary focus on two presidential aspirants, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Though the pre-election figures showed Clinton ahead, it was shocking how Donald Trump overtook her. The detailed analysis shows the progressive changes in ways of campaigning. In the past, political aspirants were able to air their ideas freely without hate. They knew and told their potential voters that their difference in political ideologies didn't mean that the other aspirants were their enemies.

Social media proved to be an effective way to gain more voters and air their ideas, especially for Donald Trump, who used Facebook effectively. The research also highlights how journalists in the past could report information objectively, allowing listeners to draw their own conclusions. In contrast, modern journalists often focus on sensationalism for personal gain, thereby neglecting the reality on the ground and more pressing matters affecting citizens. This argument was also supported by relevant examples.

I liked how the author explained the various aspects of politics, such as polarization and centrism. I specifically liked how the author provided figures to support the information entailed in the book. The various views embedded in the book from various political scientists were relevant and added to the book's importance. I liked the integration of Chapter 1 into explaining its relevance to the future of politics. Has there been a change in political ideas from the past? Read more.

"Do We Have a Center?" is a well-researched book evidenced by the numerous quotes, references, and speeches in the appendix that the author listed at the end. The author's interest in political matters made the book both engaging and enlightening to read. I found nothing to dislike about the book; it was concise and straight to the point.

I give the book a solid rating of 5 out of 5 stars because I only found two grammatical errors that could not affect readers' interest in reading it. It was also educational; I learned a lot about political issues, especially in the 2016 American presidential elections. It was interesting.


I recommend it to adult readers who have an interest in political matters, specifically readers who are comfortable reading books with severe profanity. Readers will find it interesting, especially those who would like to understand why Donald Trump gained more voters than Hillary Clinton.

******
Do We Have A Center?
View: on Bookshelves

[Gerry Steen]

Your review shows this book to be an interesting one. I remember thinking that it was imposssible for Trump to ride roughshod over all of his Republican running mates during the Republican leadership campaign in 2016. Boy, was I wrong! I still don't fully understand how America changed. This book will shed more light. Great review!

[Lene Lena]

It's great that the author provides a comprehensive examination of the 2016 election, emphasizing the transformative impact of social media on political campaigning. Social media is indeed effective during campaigns. Trump and his supporters used Twitter (X) this time around to campaign against Kamala. It never surprises me anymore to see the unconventional strategies filled with hate that they use to win. Politics is messy these days, and times are changing. Thank you for your detailed review Magdalyne!

[patricia MGBEMENA]

Walter Frank actually did a good job based on the review and I would love to understand his view on the 2016 American campaign which focuses more on Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

[Joe Alex 2]

I like how the author focuses on the shift in political campaigning, especially with social media’s impact on Donald Trump’s success. The attention to polarization and centrism in the book also seems really relevant, and it’s great to hear that the author backed up their arguments with data and perspectives from political scientists. This seems like a fascinating read for anyone interested in understanding the dynamics behind the election. It definitely sounds like something worth checking out!