Official Review: Radio Active by William O'Shaughnessy

Please use this sub-forum to discuss any non-fiction books such as autobiographies or political commentary books.
Forum rules
Authors and publishers are not able to post replies in the review topics.
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 828
Joined: 22 Mar 2019, 19:45
2019 Reading Goal: 100
2019 Reading Goal Completion: 42
Currently Reading: What Color Is Your Parachute?
Bookshelf Size: 68
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: Radio Active by William O'Shaughnessy

Official Review: Radio Active by William O'Shaughnessy

Post by evraealtana »

[Following is an official review of "Radio Active" by William O'Shaughnessy.]
Book Cover
2 out of 4 stars
Share This Review

Radio Active, written by William O’Shaughnessy, is a collection of essays, speeches, and interviews from the author’s half-century in the industry of radio broadcasting.

As one of America’s preeminent broadcast journalists, it is no surprise that O’Shaughnessy would choose to open the book with an ode to free speech, discussing what the term really means in the modern world. He touches on several past American scandals in which entertainers and politicians have been censored or fired due to “offensive speech” and then explains why these speakers, although unpopular in the moment, had a constitutional right to be heard.

Following these opening remarks, the remainder of the book is a hodgepodge collection of thoughts from a variety of sources. Many chapters are transcripts of O’Shaughnessy’s on-air interviews with experts in a vast range of fields, including politics, history, religion, and current affairs. Other chapters air the author’s own opinions in the form of humorous and light-hearted monologues. Still others consist of odes to particular personages, both living and dead; Part V, in particular, features eulogies commemorating the lives of prominent figures such as John McCain, Jimmy Breslin, and Nelson Rockefeller.

With content drawn from as recently as 2018 and as long ago as 1979, Radio Active proves O’Shaughnessy to be a long-standing and distinguished member of the journalism community. Having been unfamiliar with the author prior to reading this book, I found myself doing substantial research on the man himself and on his many guests in order to fully appreciate their exchanges.

I appreciated that the book felt polished and had clearly been well-edited. However, I found it difficult to really invest thought and emotion in the book, primarily because there was no central theme. After the initial argument in favor of the First Amendment, the rest of the book broke apart into discrete, disjointed conversations that didn’t form an argument for any position or a narrative about any subject. Each chapter was interesting in itself, but because there was no connection between chapters, the book was easy to put down at chapter breaks and difficult to pick back up.

Several sections consisted entirely of lists, such as lists of: O’Shaughnessy’s favorite songs; notable restaurants in New York City; the names of people who have been kind to the author at least once in his life; and so on. It was difficult to relate to these sections, except to reflect with admiration that the author certainly took a lot of time coming up with dozens of entries for each list.

Although I do not agree with some of the author’s views, I found nothing offensive or tasteless throughout the entirety of the book. The author does, however, pointedly express both his Christian faith and his conservative political and social views. Particularly sensitive readers of a left-leaning stance should be wary, as the book does not hesitate to demean the “liberal sharks and other windbags” that constantly “harass” notable conservative figures.

Radio Active earns a score of 2 out of 4 for its thoughtful, interesting, and eloquent discussions with a plethora of individuals on a large variety of topics. It loses one point due to its lack of any kind of theme or unifying message, and loses another point for its tendency toward listing, which holds little value for a typical reader. The book would most appeal to conservative readers that enjoy talk radio, particularly those that are already familiar with a large number of noteworthy figures in American politics and high society.

Radio Active
View: on Bookshelves | on Amazon

User avatar
Jaime Lync
Posts: 1426
Joined: 15 Mar 2017, 19:33
2019 Reading Goal: 20
2019 Reading Goal Completion: 150
2018 Reading Goal: 20
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 115
2017 Reading Goal: 12
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 500
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 120
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: God's love by Barry Gaddis

Post by Jaime Lync »

I believe in freedom of speech, but we must not abuse our freedom. Of course, as it relates to expressing one Christian faith, it is expected that some persons would feel offended even if you mean no disrespect.
The book doesn't seem like my cup of tea though. Your review is very insightful. Thanks for sharing.

User avatar
Posts: 467
Joined: 14 Jul 2019, 16:21
Favorite Book: The Elephants of Style
Currently Reading: Dragon Bones and Dao
Bookshelf Size: 288
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: A Prince of a King by Gene Abravaya

Post by Juliet+1 »

I'm too much of a "liberal shark" to appreciate this book, but I greatly appreciated your review. It's a clear and objective portrait of a collection that must have been challenging to describe.

User avatar
Posts: 198
Joined: 03 Jan 2020, 03:37
2019 Reading Goal: 1
Favorite Book: "Better dead than divorced"
Currently Reading: That Guy What Kill Topsy
Bookshelf Size: 33
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: Burn Zones by Jorge P. Newbery

Post by xoxoAnushka »

It'd be better if there were coherency present in it. I do like your review very much.

Posts: 113
Joined: 13 Mar 2019, 03:21
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 15
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: Masters and Bastards by Christopher J. Penington

Post by adamgreenrock »

Censorship is always a bad thing to do but forcing your view points on others isn't a good thing either. If the book doesn't have a consistent theme, it lacks its meaning.

Thanks for your review!

Posts: 218
Joined: 07 Feb 2020, 11:12
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 34

Post by Amy747 »

I fully believe in freedom of speech, however ive come to realise that nothing we do is free when we are so controlled by others in charge of us.

Post Reply

Return to “Non-Fiction Books”