Review of Jurisdiction Denied
Jurisdiction Denied by Jack Gold and Marc Debbaudt is a fiction novel about law amendment effects. The book belongs to the Jurisdiction series and is the second, the first being Jurisdiction Terminated. The story tackles several sub-stories, such as the story of a Korean drug cartel that had sent the enforcer Hilda to ensure a free flow of drugs in juvenile jail. She enters the United States through Los Angeles. There was two crime brother who had their brother in juvenile. Israeli agents were investigating the brothers to bring them to justice, and they came to the United States to try to catch the brothers. Marty Goldstein was the judge and the narrator of the story. Hilda targeted him since he was in the way of the free flow of drugs. What will happen? Read this book and find out.
I admire the authors' idea of using literature to address current issues affecting Americans. California passed laws that affected the juvenile justice system, making the streets insecure. The changes made the juvenile laws less strict, and the authors of this book used it to criticize that decision. They had been in the justice system for a long, and they expressed their idea that loosening juvenile justice affects public safety. I liked how the authors used descriptive content to make the book enjoyable. They describe the appearance of Hilda, creating a clear picture of how dangerous the enforcer is. Imagining it was like watching crime movies where you see a dangerous criminal posing danger to the public. Finally, I liked the authors' idea to use simpler language. The book talks about different law topics, such as justice and juvenile justice, but they decide to use simple language for everyone to understand.
I have nothing to criticize since they expressed their ideas well. I admired their idea of using this book to help change the bad decisions that put the public at risk.
I rate Jurisdiction Denied by Jack Gold and Marc Debbaudt five out of five stars. The book was exceptionally edited because I could not discover errors. I liked the idea of the authors using this book to criticize bad decisions the government makes and provide good insights. The book's presentation was good, and I think it deserves a perfect rating.
I recommend this book to people interested in making changes and reading law topics. It tackles different law topics, such as criminal justice. The authors use this book to ask for changes that guarantee public safety.
******
Jurisdiction Denied
View: on Bookshelves |
You are not logged in. Please log in or sign up to view members replies, participate in the discussion, and access more features.





















