Why is da Vinci’s name on the cover?

Use this forum to discuss the June 2018 Book of the Month"The Girl Who Knew da Vinci" by Belle Ami
User avatar
Riszell
Posts: 134
Joined: 08 May 2017, 01:18
2018 Reading Goal: 50
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 26
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 325
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-riszell.html
Latest Review: Serendipity Mystery by R.F. Kristi

Re: Why is da Vinci’s name on the cover?

Post by Riszell » 06 Jun 2018, 01:58

I agree with the marketing strategy as da Vinci captures many attention and interests as mine.

User avatar
Laura Ungureanu
Posts: 176
Joined: 25 Mar 2018, 11:32
Favorite Book: The Book Thief
Currently Reading: The Great Gatsby
Bookshelf Size: 513
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-laura-ungureanu.html
Latest Review: And Then I Met Margaret by Rob White

Post by Laura Ungureanu » 06 Jun 2018, 03:20

Titles are not always much related to the story, not because it might be a strategy to sell, but because it is an idea you should start the book with. That's my opinion, that the title should give you a feeling to keep in mind when you read, but it is not what the story is really about.

User avatar
meadhbh
Posts: 97
Joined: 16 Apr 2018, 18:30
2018 Reading Goal: 30
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 20
Currently Reading: Serendipity Mystery
Bookshelf Size: 27
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-meadhbh.html
Latest Review: beyond rock bottom by Kara Petrovic
Location: Ireland

Post by meadhbh » 06 Jun 2018, 05:11

I think it definitely was a marketing strategy. While it may not have directly aimed to capitalise on the fame of The DaVinci Code, I think it's likely trying to capitalise on the fame of DaVinci in general.

User avatar
Jgideon
Posts: 298
Joined: 03 Apr 2018, 03:37
2018 Reading Goal: 30
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 50
Favorite Book: Gates to Tangier
Currently Reading: Health Tips, Myths, and Tricks: A Physician's Advice
Bookshelf Size: 166
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jgideon.html
Latest Review: My Friend Marilyn by Christopher Lentz

Post by Jgideon » 06 Jun 2018, 06:04

Da Vinci is a very famous name that would attract the attention of millions of people to a book. I do not see anything unethical about using the name in the title. Besides, I think the author's creativity enabled the name to fit well as part of the title.

User avatar
Quinto
Posts: 598
Joined: 01 Aug 2017, 01:14
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 285
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-quinto.html
Latest Review: Heartaches 3 by H.M. Irwing

Post by Quinto » 06 Jun 2018, 09:01

The popularity of da vinci and the art based plot would make it appropriate for the book to bear his name. The name is almost a byword for anything artistic and popular in the modern context.

User avatar
SamSim
Posts: 311
Joined: 02 Apr 2018, 10:51
2018 Reading Goal: 30
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 46
Currently Reading: It's All Good: Times and Events I'd Never Want to Change
Bookshelf Size: 118
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-samsim.html
Latest Review: Stepping Up by donalyn Powell
Reading Device: B00IKPYKWG
Location: Kentucky

Post by SamSim » 06 Jun 2018, 12:12

Dael Reader wrote:
03 Jun 2018, 10:00
I wouldn't say there's anything unethical about it. The name is in the title because the "alleged" missing painting by da Vinci is a thread that holds the storylines together.
That's common thread as I understood it as well, but I have yet to read the book, so I don't have an informed opinion.
Samantha Simoneau

“But upon the stage of life, while conscience claps, let the world hiss! On the contrary if conscience disapproves, the loudest applauses of the world are of little value."
~John Adams :greetings-clapyellow:

Chandler_Greg
Posts: 22
Joined: 15 Apr 2018, 15:39
Currently Reading: Beneath the Kauri Tree
Bookshelf Size: 19
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-chandler-greg.html
Latest Review: The Buried Secrets of Peonies by Mernegar Dorgoly
Reading Device: B00I15SB16

Post by Chandler_Greg » 06 Jun 2018, 13:37

It's definitely a marketing ploy, as is the first line in Amazon's blurb: "In the spirit of The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown". It's certainly meant to suggest that the book will appeal to readers who liked Dan Brown's book. It why I got the book.

Of course, I assumed it was hyperbole, that it would not be up to Brown's caliber. Probably better that they didn't try to match his writing style. Better to copy the title than the book.

User avatar
thaservices1
Posts: 271
Joined: 21 Apr 2018, 22:22
2018 Reading Goal: 50
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 44
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 27
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-thaservices1.html
Latest Review: Belas Rift by Stephan von Clinkerhoffen
Location: USA

Post by thaservices1 » 06 Jun 2018, 18:41

Marketing strategy? Unethical? Nooooooooo......
By marketing 'strategy' do we mean just presenting the item to the market will not get the monetary gain looked for, so therefore we must have a 'strategy' to counteracting this? Perhaps if we put a similar cover on a similar named book of high monetary income, we will um ...'entice' readers who would not normally buy this book...hmmm I dunno..is deceiving such a small segment of the population for monetary gain....unethical??
I just love how corporate jargon has wormed its way into everyday language and gets so easily passed over as being ok because it's just...
Thank you for this discussion starter. I feel whole heartedly that the book cover choice was unethical. The novel's name, while not fitting and a further pull on the deception, could be justified based on the story. I also feel if a phrase like 'marketing strategy ' has to be attached to something it is already, by that definition, unethical.
Last edited by thaservices1 on 06 Jun 2018, 19:48, edited 1 time in total.
"It is not the critic that counts..."
- Roosevelt

User avatar
nikkyteewhy
Posts: 310
Joined: 27 Apr 2018, 21:25
Favorite Author: William H. Coles
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 65
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-nikkyteewhy.html
Latest Review: Al Davis Behind the Raiders Shield by Bruce Kebric and Jon Kingdon with Steve Corkran
fav_author_id: 89641

Post by nikkyteewhy » 06 Jun 2018, 19:38

I believe using Da Vince's name is just a marketing strategy, however, I'm not sure if it's ethical or not because I'm not sure who is going to give the author the consent.

Kemunto lucy
Posts: 179
Joined: 11 Apr 2018, 04:25
Currently Reading: It's Easier to Dance
Bookshelf Size: 57
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-kemunto-lucy.html
Latest Review: Of Illusions and Ink Spills by Divya Hirani

Post by Kemunto lucy » 07 Jun 2018, 14:09

I don't see anything unethical with that. The name draws attention of the reader to the book, which is a good thing.

User avatar
Cdeyoungde
Posts: 28
Joined: 28 May 2018, 22:23
2018 Reading Goal: 150
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 14
Currently Reading: Island Games
Bookshelf Size: 195
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cdeyoungde.html
Latest Review: Yesterday by Samyann
Reading Device: B00KC6I06S
Location: Texas

Post by Cdeyoungde » 07 Jun 2018, 14:29

cristinaro wrote:
04 Jun 2018, 07:57
You may be right about that, but think of the resemblance between the cover of this book and that of Dan Brown's book. Such a resemblance coupled with da Vinci's name in the title induces the idea that the two books are similar. In this case, fans of Dan Brown would be quick to check it out. I did the same only to discover they are completely different in terms of the writing style as well as character and plot development. This is the reason why I called it a potential marketing strategy and I wondered whether it was ethical or not.
I think it is definitely a marketing strategy. I thought about this as well. Could the author have used a different title to describe the book? If so, would we have been as interested to read it? I don't think so. I think the cover and the title are clearly meant to draw readers in. I know we are not supposed to judge a book by its cover and title, but with so many books on the market, the first glance is all we have to go on many times when deciding on our next read. Fortunately, with websites such as this, individuals can rely on reviews to help them make decisions on which book they want to invest time to read. I truly appreciate all the reviews, and I have downloaded books that I would have passed over had I not read the review.
Attitude is the paintbrush with which we color our lives :lol2:

User avatar
Ada4nathan
Posts: 104
Joined: 17 May 2018, 18:18
2018 Reading Goal: 30
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 16
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 19
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ada4nathan.html
Latest Review: Heartaches 3 by H.M. Irwing

Post by Ada4nathan » 07 Jun 2018, 15:35

Who knows? Maybe because of his art. But the author definitely knew she'd sell the book with that name on it.

User avatar
CambaReviewer
Posts: 321
Joined: 29 Apr 2017, 05:44
2018 Reading Goal: 100
2017 Reading Goal: 50
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 16
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 32
Favorite Book: The Barnyard Buddies STOP for Peace
Currently Reading: Lord I Surrender
Bookshelf Size: 301
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cambareviewer.html
Latest Review: Brand Real by Vasken Kalayjian
Location: Earth

Post by CambaReviewer » 07 Jun 2018, 16:32

Using Da Vinci's name is a great marketing strategy. His major connection to the story is that a painting by him is missing. That, in my opinion, is not enough to make him 'deserving' of being mentioned in the title, but it is a strategy that will help sell the book. I do not think it is legally unethical. However, I will not do it if I were the author.

Callistus Ibenye
Posts: 31
Joined: 04 Jun 2018, 16:52
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 17
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-callistus-ibenye.html
Latest Review: Happiness is All We Want! by Ashutosh Mishra

Post by Callistus Ibenye » 07 Jun 2018, 17:20

Yes, I agree that the author might have used davinci's name as a marketing stategy to draw attention to his work , and I don't see anything unethical about that at all, as far as the contents of the book thereof is original.

User avatar
kemp1kor
Posts: 151
Joined: 04 Feb 2018, 19:07
2018 Reading Goal: 100
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 21
Currently Reading: End of the Last Great Kingdom
Bookshelf Size: 145
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-kemp1kor.html
Latest Review: The Darkest Hour by Jasmin Quinn
Reading Device: B00GNKRFEA
Location: Minnesota

Post by kemp1kor » 07 Jun 2018, 19:57

It probably was a marketing strategy, but since Da Vinci is tied into the storyline I wouldn’t consider it unethical.

Post Reply

Return to “Discuss "The Girl Who Knew da Vinci" by Belle Ami”