Why is da Vinci’s name on the cover?

Use this forum to discuss the June 2018 Book of the Month"The Girl Who Knew da Vinci" by Belle Ami
User avatar
cristinaro
Posts: 584
Joined: 07 Jan 2018, 03:51
Favorite Book: The Magic Mountain
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 77
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cristinaro.html
Latest Review: The Alaskan Incident by Joseph Walls
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Why is da Vinci’s name on the cover?

Post by cristinaro » 03 Jun 2018, 04:12

Leonardo da Vinci is an episodic character in the novel. Considering the overabundance of fictional books using his life as a pretext, would you agree with such a marketing strategy?

Do you think that Fioretta and Giuliano’s story and the different references to Leonardo’s work are reasons enough to use his name in the title? Is it ethical or not?
"The madness of writing is the antidote to true madness." (Hanif Kureishi)

User avatar
Dael Reader
Posts: 209
Joined: 05 May 2018, 08:39
Currently Reading: Superhighway
Bookshelf Size: 36
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dael-reader.html
Latest Review: A Second, Less Capable Head by James Hanna
Reading Device: 1400697484
Location: Ohio

Post by Dael Reader » 03 Jun 2018, 10:00

I wouldn't say there's anything unethical about it. The name is in the title because the "alleged" missing painting by da Vinci is a thread that holds the storylines together.

User avatar
Dolor
Posts: 1727
Joined: 07 Nov 2017, 14:41
2018 Reading Goal: 200
2017 Reading Goal: 5
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 9
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 140
Favorite Author: Eliot H. Robinson
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 4411
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dolor.html
Latest Review: Mare's Nest by Larry Darter
Reading Device: 1400697484
fav_author_id: 105359
Location: Saudi Arabia

Post by Dolor » 03 Jun 2018, 20:59

Since da Vinci is a very well-known artist, it might spark as a marketing strategy but there's nothing unethical in doing so despite the fact that the author is using his name. I agree with what Dael Reader said, "The name is in the title because the "alleged" missing painting by da Vinci is a thread that holds the storylines together."

User avatar
cristinaro
Posts: 584
Joined: 07 Jan 2018, 03:51
Favorite Book: The Magic Mountain
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 77
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cristinaro.html
Latest Review: The Alaskan Incident by Joseph Walls
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by cristinaro » 04 Jun 2018, 07:57

Dael Reader wrote:
03 Jun 2018, 10:00
I wouldn't say there's anything unethical about it. The name is in the title because the "alleged" missing painting by da Vinci is a thread that holds the storylines together.
You may be right about that, but think of the resemblance between the cover of this book and that of Dan Brown's book. Such a resemblance coupled with da Vinci's name in the title induces the idea that the two books are similar. In this case, fans of Dan Brown would be quick to check it out. I did the same only to discover they are completely different in terms of the writing style as well as character and plot development. This is the reason why I called it a potential marketing strategy and I wondered whether it was ethical or not.
"The madness of writing is the antidote to true madness." (Hanif Kureishi)

User avatar
cristinaro
Posts: 584
Joined: 07 Jan 2018, 03:51
Favorite Book: The Magic Mountain
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 77
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cristinaro.html
Latest Review: The Alaskan Incident by Joseph Walls
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by cristinaro » 04 Jun 2018, 08:06

Dolor wrote:
03 Jun 2018, 20:59
Since da Vinci is a very well-known artist, it might spark as a marketing strategy but there's nothing unethical in doing so despite the fact that the author is using his name. I agree with what Dael Reader said, "The name is in the title because the "alleged" missing painting by da Vinci is a thread that holds the storylines together."
For the sake of argument, have patience with me for a second. When I read the title "The Girl Who Knew da Vinci", what do I think of? I imagine I would learn a lot of things about da Vinci, things from his personal as well as his professional life. You've already said what a famous artist da Vinci was. Besides, there are so many things we don't know about his complex personality. He expressed himself in so many domains. Does the novel rise to the level of my expectations as promised by the title? I would say no, considering it turns out to be nothing more than a romance which uses da Vinci's name and the paranormal elements to lure more readers.
"The madness of writing is the antidote to true madness." (Hanif Kureishi)

User avatar
Dael Reader
Posts: 209
Joined: 05 May 2018, 08:39
Currently Reading: Superhighway
Bookshelf Size: 36
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dael-reader.html
Latest Review: A Second, Less Capable Head by James Hanna
Reading Device: 1400697484
Location: Ohio

Post by Dael Reader » 04 Jun 2018, 11:47

cristinaro wrote:
04 Jun 2018, 07:57
Dael Reader wrote:
03 Jun 2018, 10:00
I wouldn't say there's anything unethical about it. The name is in the title because the "alleged" missing painting by da Vinci is a thread that holds the storylines together.
You may be right about that, but think of the resemblance between the cover of this book and that of Dan Brown's book. Such a resemblance coupled with da Vinci's name in the title induces the idea that the two books are similar. In this case, fans of Dan Brown would be quick to check it out. I did the same only to discover they are completely different in terms of the writing style as well as character and plot development. This is the reason why I called it a potential marketing strategy and I wondered whether it was ethical or not.
Dael Reader wrote: I see what you mean now. You're right, it is reminiscent of the Dan Brown cover and very much could be a potential marketing strategy. Which does make the author seem bit sneaky. I personally would not do such a thing, but unethical is a strong term.

User avatar
Dael Reader
Posts: 209
Joined: 05 May 2018, 08:39
Currently Reading: Superhighway
Bookshelf Size: 36
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dael-reader.html
Latest Review: A Second, Less Capable Head by James Hanna
Reading Device: 1400697484
Location: Ohio

Post by Dael Reader » 04 Jun 2018, 11:56

cristinaro wrote:
04 Jun 2018, 07:57
Dael Reader wrote:
03 Jun 2018, 10:00
I wouldn't say there's anything unethical about it. The name is in the title because the "alleged" missing painting by da Vinci is a thread that holds the storylines together.
You may be right about that, but think of the resemblance between the cover of this book and that of Dan Brown's book. Such a resemblance coupled with da Vinci's name in the title induces the idea that the two books are similar. In this case, fans of Dan Brown would be quick to check it out. I did the same only to discover they are completely different in terms of the writing style as well as character and plot development. This is the reason why I called it a potential marketing strategy and I wondered whether it was ethical or not.
"Dael Reader"user_id=732648 wrote: Also, Angela is apparently the reincarnation of Fioretta, wife of Guiliano Medici and muse of Leonardo da Vinci. Angela is "channeling" Fioretta's memories. So she is the girl who knew da Vinci. (Incidentally, I'm actually only half-way through the book, and I am not impressed with the reincarnation storyline. ) {/quote]

User avatar
Miriam Molina
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 3112
Joined: 02 May 2017, 20:17
2018 Reading Goal: 48
2017 Reading Goal: 36
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 64
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 125
Currently Reading: A Stained White Radiance
Bookshelf Size: 508
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-miriam-molina.html
Latest Review: Just a Shelter Dog by Sally H. Cronk
Reading Device: B00KC6I06S

Post by Miriam Molina » 04 Jun 2018, 20:11

I am sure the author wanted readers to remember Dan Brown's controversial and highly successful book. I don't know if there would be problems with copyright infringement or other laws on publishing. But I guess Belle Ami got what she wanted. Here we are comparing her book to Brown's.

User avatar
Sushan
Posts: 128
Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
2018 Reading Goal: 10
2017 Reading Goal: 0
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 60
Currently Reading: The Devil's Fool
Bookshelf Size: 36
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan.html
Latest Review: Randy Love...at your service by Shay Carter
Location: Sri Lanka

Post by Sushan » 05 Jun 2018, 05:23

I also think that the name has much marketing value than its relevance to the story. Yet, it is da vinci, the character who holds the strands of story together so, I don't think that is unethical
:techie-studyingbrown: $u$han €kanayak€ :techie-studyingbrown:

Mely918
Posts: 194
Joined: 14 May 2018, 19:15
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 11
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-mely918.html
Latest Review: Strong Heart by Charlie Sheldon

Post by Mely918 » 05 Jun 2018, 17:17

I don't think there's anything unethical about using da Vinci's name for the title. I think it's simply a means to draw a prospective reader's attention since da Vinci is such a well-known painter and innovator.

User avatar
alisonedgee
Posts: 128
Joined: 19 Mar 2018, 20:30
2018 Reading Goal: 50
2017 Reading Goal: 0
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 22
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 15
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-alisonedgee.html
Latest Review: The Ultimate Guide to Zombies by Dave Robertson
Location: London

Post by alisonedgee » 05 Jun 2018, 21:15

I mean, sure it's super relevant to the plot, and that's a good excuse for the title, but I'm of a very cynical disposition and i would say it's just a marketing strategy. but not a very clever one.

User avatar
starshipsaga
Posts: 170
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 10:12
2018 Reading Goal: 100
2017 Reading Goal: 0
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 9
Currently Reading: Pines
Bookshelf Size: 2054
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-starshipsaga.html
Latest Review: Boston Burning by Eric Salin

Post by starshipsaga » 05 Jun 2018, 21:19

I think this is a scenario where it can be both. As others have said, the character holds the story together, but if his name in the title also draws readers to the book or at least make them do a double take, there's nothing wrong with that either :)

Wesley Liu
Posts: 28
Joined: 29 May 2018, 21:13
Currently Reading: The Boy in the Striped Pajamas
Bookshelf Size: 15

Post by Wesley Liu » 05 Jun 2018, 22:49

Although I agree that Da Vinci is part of the main cause of the overall storyline, it could have been used as a marketing strategy. Fans of Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code (which are many) would immediately feel urged to read this book due to the similarities that seem to be connected between the two almost completely different books.

User avatar
Helen_Combe
Posts: 1059
Joined: 18 Feb 2018, 12:17
2018 Reading Goal: 30
2017 Reading Goal: 0
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 220
Favorite Book: The Martian
Currently Reading: The Barnyard Buddies STOP for Peace
Bookshelf Size: 119
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-helen-combe.html
Latest Review: They Do That for the Dead by Alan M. Blank
Reading Device: B00M4L4MFC
Location: Solihull, UK

Post by Helen_Combe » 06 Jun 2018, 00:36

Considering that I’ve seen charity shops with signs in the window saying ’please, no more Da Vinci Codes’, I’m not sure that it’s a good selling point. It might have been a bestseller, but few people hung on to it after reading it. Personally, I thought The Day Vinci Code was tripe. Brown has written much better books.
A thesaurus is necessary, essential, indispensable, vital, crucial and fundamental.

User avatar
JR Mercier
Posts: 78
Joined: 23 May 2018, 05:03
2018 Reading Goal: 0
Favorite Book: The Bear and the Nightingale
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 105
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jr-mercier.html
Latest Review: The Kingdom of Thieves by Mitchell Edward Bell
Location: South Africa

Post by JR Mercier » 06 Jun 2018, 01:33

Dolor wrote:
03 Jun 2018, 20:59
Since da Vinci is a very well-known artist, it might spark as a marketing strategy but there's nothing unethical in doing so despite the fact that the author is using his name. I agree with what Dael Reader said, "The name is in the title because the "alleged" missing painting by da Vinci is a thread that holds the storylines together."
I agree. It's not exactly clickbait but it does help the selling of the book. Unethical? I don't think so. But it is good to question these things.

Post Reply

Return to “Discuss "The Girl Who Knew da Vinci" by Belle Ami”