Do you think the book was one-sided or fair?

Use this forum to discuss the March 2018 Book of the Month, "Final Notice" by Van Fleisher.
User avatar
shidawn
Posts: 16
Joined: 05 May 2018, 08:47
2018 Reading Goal: 16
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 25
Currently Reading: Superhighway
Bookshelf Size: 14
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-shidawn.html
Latest Review: Jonny the boy from the road by J.n.stephenson

Re: Do you think the book was one-sided or fair?

Post by shidawn » 22 May 2018, 21:39

I would definitely say that it is one-sided, not just on gun control but on issues such as immigration, racism, and even his feelings toward politics in general. With that being said, I will say that on some issues, I lean more toward his side, and on other issues, I lean more toward the other side, but I still enjoyed the book. It didn't offend me or make me want to argue with him. While it didn't change my view on anything, there were a few points where it made me think through issues on a deeper level.

User avatar
TrishaAnn92
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 3982
Joined: 20 Oct 2013, 15:59
2017 Reading Goal: 90
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 16
Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... =2595">The Messenger (2)</a>
Currently Reading: A Game of Thrones
Bookshelf Size: 196
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-trishaann92.html
Latest Review: Final Notice by Van Fleisher
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
Publishing Contest Votes: 20
Location: Virginia, US

Post by TrishaAnn92 » 01 Jun 2018, 21:35

I thought it was very left-leaning, it became obvious very early on in the book. This was a very uncomfortable book to read in that every character was practically the same in their beliefs. I respect the authors view, and it is his opinion (which he is upfront about) so I would say it is fair.
‘A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies,’ said Jojen. ‘The man who never reads lives only one.’

– George R. R. Martin



"I solemnly swear I am up to no good."
-Harry Potter

User avatar
Kendra M Parker
Posts: 395
Joined: 07 Apr 2018, 07:49
2018 Reading Goal: 50
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 68
Currently Reading: Teaching from Rest
Bookshelf Size: 391
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-kendra-m-parker.html
Latest Review: World, Incorporated by Tom Gariffo
Reading Device: B00GDQDRPK
Location: Virginia

Post by Kendra M Parker » 02 Jun 2018, 13:30

From the very start of the book, it is easy to tell that the book is going to be one-sided. The characterization of Fox News is probably just the first example. The characterization of the NRA rep on FoxNews also showed that thr author had little respect for them, too.

For those who agree, that makes for an easy read and doesn’t really require any extra thought on their part. If a reader is not on that side, though, I think it can make it really hard for the reader to finish the book. It is helpful to at least address the opposing side's concerns and provide some argument for your point of view if you want to make a change in someone else's opinion.

User avatar
Christine Penny
Posts: 21
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 10:06
2017 Reading Goal: 125
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 8
Currently Reading: Bad Medicine
Bookshelf Size: 25
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-christine-penny.html
Latest Review: "Something" by Shelby Lamb
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by Christine Penny » 08 Jun 2018, 11:36

I am not even 20 percent into the book and I am sickened by the liberal soaked pages already! I realize why it is so hard to get through this book... It doesn't even seem like real conversations, it seems somewhat stilted...like it is just liberal banter interspersed with conversation to try to hide the animosity that is always behind the liberal agenda...I really wanted to give this book a try, and I really want to be a big part of this book club... and I guess that means reading the garbage with the good to be a great reviewer... but a book like this should be called what it is...political banter and not fiction... it is definitely one-sided. And can't be fair because the writer doesn't even understand the other side of the coin. If anyone really knew what the forefathers meant for this country to be like... there wouldn't be any screaming liberals, we would all have them shunned for being pathological liars.

User avatar
chupke07
Posts: 133
Joined: 14 May 2018, 18:35
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 15
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-chupke07.html
Latest Review: The Girl Who Knew Da Vinci by Belle Ami

Post by chupke07 » 14 Jun 2018, 11:36

I am still working my way through the book, but it is very one sided. It honestly distracts from the story line and the main point of the text so far. Less general criticism of the right and more storytelling with it mixed in would be far more effective and would probably find a broader audience.

User avatar
CheyenneR
Posts: 133
Joined: 11 Feb 2018, 23:37
2018 Reading Goal: 15
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 113
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 19
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cheyenner.html
Latest Review: World, Incorporated by Tom Gariffo
Location: Tennessee

Post by CheyenneR » 18 Jun 2018, 22:08

I felt that it was pretty fair considering the current climate in the US. If I had to pick I would say that the author is pretty anti-gun but I don't think that it takes away from the story at all. I feel that it sometimes helps to know what side the author is on because it helps the reader to formulate their own opinion better.

User avatar
Storm+
Posts: 72
Joined: 01 Jun 2018, 04:25
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 18
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-storm.html
Latest Review: Guilt by David Taylor Black

Post by Storm+ » 27 Jun 2018, 16:13

This book definitely leans more toward the left's view of control. Throughout the story, the NRA is made into the villain by encouraging gun rights, which, in turn, allows for more gun violence. However, it is not the author's responsibility to cover all sides of an issue. While it might have been nice to have a character or two from the other side of the gun control debate, the author does not have to tell the story any other way than his own. In fact, he even acknowledges in his introduction that he has more liberal views of gun control and that he supports it. The point of the book is not to be "fair," it is to persuade others toward the author's point of view by explaining the truth as he sees it. Whether we agree or not is not his problem.

User avatar
Jillpillbooknerd
Posts: 118
Joined: 27 Feb 2018, 09:40
2018 Reading Goal: 200
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 4
Currently Reading: Seventh Son of a Seventh Son
Bookshelf Size: 1791
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jillpillbooknerd.html
Latest Review: Final Notice by Van Fleisher
Reading Device: B00IKPYKWG
Location: Key West, Florida

Post by Jillpillbooknerd » 10 Jul 2018, 08:38

It was definitely very one sided when it comes to guns and gun control. It painted the NRA as the "bad guy" and even killed some of the "evil" employees towards the end of the book.

User avatar
cpedley
Posts: 5
Joined: 19 Jun 2018, 15:07
Currently Reading: The Honorable Knight
Bookshelf Size: 9

Post by cpedley » 11 Jul 2018, 18:11

I think there might be a more ethical issue behind the book that is more than gun control. To me, the issue of gun control is the medium through which the concept of time is explored.

At first, I thought the narration was unbiased, but it seems to just be commentary of the character. Now the characters are biased, but some don’t care either way. Earl used to be in the army. He owned a gun. Vince didn’t and didn’t, but he acknowledged the opposition when watching Fox News.

Regardless, the Final Notice was the most engaging aspect of the text. I kept thinking of my Dad and his last week and what would have happened had he had this capability, but I’m not sure I’d want to know. Or to know it was coming. This concept is something I think a lot of people struggle with and think about, such as Vance acknowledging he is getting older although he doesn’t feel that way.

Jessica Reehl
Posts: 52
Joined: 09 Jul 2018, 16:32
Currently Reading: Goodnight Irene
Bookshelf Size: 22
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jessica-reehl.html
Latest Review: The Unbound Soul by Richard L. Haight
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by Jessica Reehl » 26 Jul 2018, 12:27

It was definitely left leaning. But, also well researched and well presented. I did feel like there was a bit of class warfare. The "good guys" were educated and mostly wealthy, the " bad guys" were presented as "thugs."

User avatar
Jennifer Fernandez
Posts: 170
Joined: 09 Jun 2018, 21:30
2018 Reading Goal: 10
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 200
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 68
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jennifer-fernandez.html
Latest Review: Superhighway 2 by Alex Fayman
Location: United Sates

Post by Jennifer Fernandez » 01 Aug 2018, 17:35

The book was definitely one-sided. Ideologically speaking, I'm not a right person but I'm neither a left. I tend to go more towards the left side but I believe in balance and about taking the best of both sides. That said the book was leaning very far towards the left. There's nothing wrong with that. To each its own. But, when almost all the good guys are minorities but all the bad guys are white people, there's a problem. Especially when it said that white people never faced police brutality. I think a bit more balance would not have hurt the book.
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. - H.P. Lovecraft :techie-studyinggray:

Post Reply

Return to “Discuss "Final Notice" by Van Fleisher”