Was it too risky for Jennifer to donate blood to Jose?

Use this forum to discuss the November 2017 Book of the Month, 30th Century: Escape by Mark Kingston Levin, PhD.
User avatar
JadeK
Posts: 64
Joined: 12 May 2017, 15:02
2017 Reading Goal: 50
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 10
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 17
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jadek.html
Latest Review: Heartaches by H.M. Irwing
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Re: Was it too risky for Jennifer to donate blood to Jose?

Post by JadeK » 22 Dec 2017, 15:08

I do think that what Jennifer did was risky. However, when it means saving someone else's life I think the risk is worth it. She did the right thing in the situation.

User avatar
Bluecobia
Posts: 328
Joined: 08 Jul 2017, 12:19
2018 Reading Goal: 26
2017 Reading Goal: 20
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 61
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 45
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 49
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-bluecobia.html
Latest Review: The miner by F.Robert

Post by Bluecobia » 23 Dec 2017, 21:46

She knew it was a safe thing to do. No reason to not try to save a life.
Latest Review: The miner by F.Robert

User avatar
ritah
Posts: 535
Joined: 24 Jun 2017, 06:52
2018 Reading Goal: 150
2017 Reading Goal: 20
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 21
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 80
Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 03345">The Darziods' Stone</a>
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 131
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ritah.html
Latest Review: The Queen of Xana by Fred Pilcher

Post by ritah » 26 Dec 2017, 14:48

Anirudh Badri wrote:
17 Nov 2017, 11:52
The risk from drawing too much blood, while real, is much less of a risk to me than letting someone die when I could possibly save them. I think she made the right call since there was not a great deal of hope for Jose otherwise
I feel the same way. Letting someone die when I could have saved them from certain death, would haunt me and eventually eat me up inside.

User avatar
Whitney Marchelle
Posts: 254
Joined: 10 Oct 2017, 12:16
2017 Reading Goal: 50
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 20
Currently Reading: Clan and Conscience (Clan beginnings Book 6)
Bookshelf Size: 46
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-whitney-marchelle.html
Latest Review: Superhighway by Alex Fayman

Post by Whitney Marchelle » 27 Dec 2017, 18:50

I think she took too much, giving some blood, that's okay. but to basically have two people on the team too weak to do anything in case of attack was not smart at all to me.

User avatar
Lebs
Posts: 30
Joined: 14 Nov 2017, 11:34
Currently Reading: Lady Killers: Deadly Women Throughout History
Bookshelf Size: 189
Reading Device: B00OD01MLY

Post by Lebs » 03 Jan 2018, 15:26

Definitely. She was the only one who was quick and thinking on her feet. However, I don't know why she gave so much- it could have adversely affected her.

User avatar
micoleon13
Posts: 453
Joined: 20 May 2016, 20:33
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 90
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-micoleon13.html
Latest Review: Hell in the Heavens: The Saga of a WW2 Bomber Pilot by Morton E Tavel, MD

Post by micoleon13 » 04 Jan 2018, 16:08

ashley_claire wrote:
03 Nov 2017, 07:43
I agree that it was the right thing to do but the amount she was able to donate was suspicious. I also found it odd that nobody ever asked her to show them exactly how she did the test. Being that it's a group of scientists and research students, I would think that's something they would want to know just for curiosity's sake.
That's a very good point. Its so easy to just gloss over the realistic parts for the sake of fiction, such as how much she gave and not questioning her knowledge. There's some lee way with poetic license, but if readers start questioning it, you know that it went to far

jennyd2003
Posts: 355
Joined: 21 Jun 2017, 13:34
Currently Reading: Dead Until Dark
Bookshelf Size: 111
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jennyd2003.html
Latest Review: The Witch of Endor by RK Wheeler

Post by jennyd2003 » 05 Jan 2018, 00:54

I think she took too big a risk. She should have taken a smaller amount and asked for help in setting up the draw. She wouldn't have risked blowing her cover as much and felt better too.

User avatar
NL Hartje
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 1244
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 12:58
2018 Reading Goal: 30
2017 Reading Goal: 0
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 143
Favorite Book: Kushiel's Dart
Currently Reading: Neverwhere
Bookshelf Size: 384
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-nl-hartje.html
Latest Review: Poor Will's Almanack for 2019 and Horoscope in Nature by Bill Felker

Post by NL Hartje » 10 Jan 2018, 01:06

Eh, it's so easy to say it was the right call and I would do the same.

In reality though, I think I would have been too scared to do what she did. Although I'm truly impulsive, I'm also working very hard to shed a long ingrained type A persona, and I wonder if I could do something like that in real time scenario.
“So the writer who breeds more words than he needs, is making a chore for the reader who reads.”
-Dr. Seuss

User avatar
DustinPBrown
Posts: 177
Joined: 10 Oct 2017, 15:58
Currently Reading: God of War, Ares
Bookshelf Size: 312
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dustinpbrown.html
Latest Review: It's Never Water Under the Bridge by Rianne Moss

Post by DustinPBrown » 11 Jan 2018, 04:15

micoleon13 wrote:
04 Jan 2018, 16:08
ashley_claire wrote:
03 Nov 2017, 07:43
I agree that it was the right thing to do but the amount she was able to donate was suspicious. I also found it odd that nobody ever asked her to show them exactly how she did the test. Being that it's a group of scientists and research students, I would think that's something they would want to know just for curiosity's sake.
That's a very good point. Its so easy to just gloss over the realistic parts for the sake of fiction, such as how much she gave and not questioning her knowledge. There's some lee way with poetic license, but if readers start questioning it, you know that it went to far
Yeah, it seemed unrealistic to me too that she should give so much without anyone really questioning it. I mean, the body only has like 6 pints of blood anyway, right? She took out half her blood and no one batted an eye? Hard to believe, and moments like these do draw the reader out of a story, which is what we don't want.

eBookreviewer
Posts: 82
Joined: 28 Dec 2017, 17:29
Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... =8714">The Angel's Game</a>
Currently Reading: Diary of a Snoopy Cat
Bookshelf Size: 22
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ebookreviewer.html
Latest Review: Who Told You That You Were Naked? by William Combs
Reading Device: B06XD5YCKX

Post by eBookreviewer » 02 Feb 2018, 06:16

I think this was the right thing to do at the time, although it was too risky.

Mitchell Starc
Posts: 33
Joined: 07 Dec 2017, 18:51
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 27
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-mitchell-starc.html
Latest Review: Bread Fat by Joseph Eldor

Post by Mitchell Starc » 04 Feb 2018, 23:22

Yes, it was dangerous as too much of the blood was lost and still she chose to donate blood

User avatar
Samy Lax
Posts: 615
Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 01:40
2018 Reading Goal: 38
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 110
Currently Reading: Played to Death
Bookshelf Size: 85
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-samy-lax.html
Latest Review: Voyeurs by Dennis James Bartel

Post by Samy Lax » 10 Feb 2018, 11:21

I guess love has a way of throwing caution out the window. So, I guess it just didn't matter to Jennifer.
“For all our failings, despite our limitations and fallibilities, we humans are capable of greatness.”
― Carl Sagan, Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space

User avatar
innah96
Posts: 39
Joined: 26 Jan 2018, 04:05
2018 Reading Goal: 20
2017 Reading Goal: 0
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 85
Currently Reading: How A Good Person Can Really Win
Bookshelf Size: 21
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-innah96.html
Latest Review: Trip to Adele by R I Alyaseer and A I Alyaseer

Post by innah96 » 16 Feb 2018, 09:41

I am sure I would have done the same thing - wouldn't even have though of what might've happen or the risks...

Emmanae
Posts: 115
Joined: 15 Jan 2018, 19:16
2018 Reading Goal: 100
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 34
Currently Reading: The Power
Bookshelf Size: 62
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-emmanae.html
Latest Review: Discover Your Thinner Self by David Medansky
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by Emmanae » 16 Feb 2018, 11:24

I'm not sure if she would just be weak afterwards. I know people who faint after one pint, so I just can't imagine three.

User avatar
Kalin Adi
Posts: 1093
Joined: 01 May 2017, 14:29
2018 Reading Goal: 15
2017 Reading Goal: 5
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 86
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 680
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 118
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-kalin-adi.html
Latest Review: We Love Short Shorts by Kathy Lindsey

Post by Kalin Adi » 17 Feb 2018, 19:58

I do think it was risky. She was lucky Kai wasn't paying attention to what she was doing. And three pints??? It clearly shows this is a sci-fiction story.

Post Reply

Return to “Discuss "30th Century: Escape" by Mark Kingston Levin, PhD”