Author's Note

Discuss the October 2017 Book of the Month, Strong Heart by Charlie Sheldon.

View Strong Heart on Bookshelves

View Strong Heart on Amazon
Post Reply
User avatar
Colleen0701
Posts: 75
Joined: 16 Sep 2015, 01:31
2018 Reading Goal: 36
2017 Reading Goal: 24
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 19
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 66
Currently Reading: Testimony of an Irish slave girl
Bookshelf Size: 54
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-colleen0701.html
Latest Review: "Kennedy's Revenge" by Stephen L Rodenbeck

Author's Note

Post by Colleen0701 » 01 Nov 2017, 06:30

At the end of Strong Heart Charlie Sheldon shares with us his hypotheses about early migration. I must say I agree wholeheartedly.

Leaky and others have determined that prehistory in both North and South America do not date earlier than the Clovis civilisation. Although there are two sites which are now accepted as pre-Clovis sites.

One is close to Meadowbrook on the East coast where the Vikings later landed. The other is in the Mississippi Basin. In fact, all the prehistory sites are just north of the Mississippi Basin or in it.

Even if we accept that people migrated from Asia, where are the fossils on the west coast? Where is the evidence in the Appalachians which they would have to cross to get to the basin. Same story in South America, there are few fossil sites, they are spread out and none near the Andes.

Going back to 20-50ka years ago, there was a glacial period during that age. The Bering sea was iced over - they could have walked from Asia to America. Certainly that period of time did nothing to distract the Europeans at the same Northern latitude from migrating.

So I find a major loophole in academia's logic when they contend that Asiatics migrated down the Wilson line and hop skipped a few islands to appear in Australia 400ka ago, but they could not make the journey east until 15ka years ago.

I think the evidence is either sitting under the sand in the Pacific or deep under snow in the mountains. I believe the evidence is there - but nobody has found it yet.

What do you think my fellow amateur historians? :techie-studyingbrown:
Some people read to live. I live to read.

User avatar
Javier Campos
Posts: 34
Joined: 12 Oct 2017, 21:47
Favorite Book: One Hundred Years of Solitude
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 20
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-javier-campos.html
Latest Review: "The Right to Nominate" by Thomas E Peterson

Post by Javier Campos » 01 Nov 2017, 10:02

The theory that the first settlers came from Asia is way too strong, sadly the concluding evidence might be under the sea now. Sea levels rose quite a bit several thousand years ago.

Charlie Sheldon
Posts: 49
Joined: 07 Apr 2017, 13:23
Bookshelf Size: 0

Post by Charlie Sheldon » 01 Nov 2017, 11:25

I made every effort to insure that all the historical and scientific evidence my characters discussed in Strong Heart was based in fact, with a scientific basis. So, for example, Myra's reference to Huyetalco in Mexico is real. Similarly the Manis mastadon spearpoint and bone is real, you can see it in the museum in Sequim, 13,800 years old, which is 1800 years older than Clovis. Javier is correct - all evidence from the time of great ice along the coast is probably buried beneath rising seas. There are enormous arguments about old sites in the Americas, most of them not accepted at the current time for a variety of reasons, mostly sound I think. However, there is a site in the Yukon that has dated to 24,000 years old, seriously, and just recently a cut mastadon bone was found in California that seems to be 130,000 years old, perhaps supporting the Huyetalco thesis that the Mexican site might have been that old as well. Point being, we know a lot yet we know very little, and any theory we have is the truth today unless and until it is supplanted by another theory. I always said to myself while I was watching this tale appear in 2013-2014 that the Good Lord has a wicked sense of humor and within a few years of the book being published there will be a find in the Americas supporting my thesis, which from a selfish perspective will help me sell copies, make me look briliiant, and begin a raging debate about such a huge shift in human origins thinking. That hasn't happened. Yet .But maybe the Yukon site is the start, or the cut mastadon bone in San Diego (it will take years to confirm or fully debunk this recent find). The way it seems changing theories work, it seems to me, is that when first offered all those who have made their careers on finding or supporting the previous theory rise up and defend their thesis to the death (almost literally), such that any new find, to change things, has to be incontrovertible, unmistakable, and huge. For those of you who read Strong Heart, the Marking Place would be such a site, perhaps - that is, assuming you believe Sarah's journey was a real journey to a real place, and not a dream..... 8) 8)

User avatar
Colleen0701
Posts: 75
Joined: 16 Sep 2015, 01:31
2018 Reading Goal: 36
2017 Reading Goal: 24
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 19
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 66
Currently Reading: Testimony of an Irish slave girl
Bookshelf Size: 54
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-colleen0701.html
Latest Review: "Kennedy's Revenge" by Stephen L Rodenbeck

Post by Colleen0701 » 02 Nov 2017, 01:32

I really think that academia do see this illogical loophole. However the coast is long, where does even begin? Even with a probable route of migration in hand. I too think hat once archaeologists unearth the first real find raising some questions, they'll plot and plan and and then they might know better as to where they should dig. If the Europeans are digging 22 metres down in a valley to get to the Paleolithic level, one can only guess that the same number must apply to any site on the west coast of the America's or the Appalachians.
Some people read to live. I live to read.

User avatar
Javier Campos
Posts: 34
Joined: 12 Oct 2017, 21:47
Favorite Book: One Hundred Years of Solitude
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 20
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-javier-campos.html
Latest Review: "The Right to Nominate" by Thomas E Peterson

Post by Javier Campos » 02 Nov 2017, 14:37

Charlie Sheldon wrote:I made every effort to insure that all the historical and scientific evidence my characters discussed in Strong Heart was based in fact, with a scientific basis. So, for example, Myra's reference to Huyetalco in Mexico is real. Similarly the Manis mastadon spearpoint and bone is real, you can see it in the museum in Sequim, 13,800 years old, which is 1800 years older than Clovis. Javier is correct - all evidence from the time of great ice along the coast is probably buried beneath rising seas. There are enormous arguments about old sites in the Americas, most of them not accepted at the current time for a variety of reasons, mostly sound I think. However, there is a site in the Yukon that has dated to 24,000 years old, seriously, and just recently a cut mastadon bone was found in California that seems to be 130,000 years old, perhaps supporting the Huyetalco thesis that the Mexican site might have been that old as well. Point being, we know a lot yet we know very little, and any theory we have is the truth today unless and until it is supplanted by another theory. I always said to myself while I was watching this tale appear in 2013-2014 that the Good Lord has a wicked sense of humor and within a few years of the book being published there will be a find in the Americas supporting my thesis, which from a selfish perspective will help me sell copies, make me look briliiant, and begin a raging debate about such a huge shift in human origins thinking. That hasn't happened. Yet .But maybe the Yukon site is the start, or the cut mastadon bone in San Diego (it will take years to confirm or fully debunk this recent find). The way it seems changing theories work, it seems to me, is that when first offered all those who have made their careers on finding or supporting the previous theory rise up and defend their thesis to the death (almost literally), such that any new find, to change things, has to be incontrovertible, unmistakable, and huge. For those of you who read Strong Heart, the Marking Place would be such a site, perhaps - that is, assuming you believe Sarah's journey was a real journey to a real place, and not a dream..... 8) 8)
It is aweasome to read your reply. I loved your book congratulations!

User avatar
Momiji1987
Posts: 197
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 01:22
2018 Reading Goal: 12
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 0
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 17
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-momiji1987.html
Latest Review: "The Elf Brief" by Jordan David

Post by Momiji1987 » 06 Dec 2017, 18:47

Hmm. That's very interesting. I'm not sure what to think honestly. The only thing I'm really sure of is history always changes because we rarely have all the information. I guess we're fortunate to know as much as we do!

User avatar
Bancroft
Posts: 96
Joined: 28 Nov 2017, 04:05
2017 Reading Goal: 50
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 8
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 14
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-bancroft.html
Latest Review: "Unshielded Past" by Patti Morelli

Post by Bancroft » 11 Dec 2017, 06:12

Oh dear author! Honestly speaking the book is not like the one I was expecting. That is the reality and a bad cover

Post Reply

Return to “Discuss "Strong Heart" by Charlie Sheldon”