I am vs. I'm

Discuss the June 2017 Book of the Month, Superhighway by Alex Fayman. Superhighway is the first book in the Superhighway Trilogy, so feel free to use this forum to discuss not only the first book but also the other books in the series.

View Superhighway on Bookshelves
User avatar
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 1460
Joined: 14 Feb 2018, 15:30
2018 Reading Goal: 100
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 76
Currently Reading: Eye of the World
Bookshelf Size: 265
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-kfwilson6.html
Latest Review: Serendipity Mystery: Diary of a Snoopy Cat by R.F. Kristi
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
Location: Louisiana

Re: I am vs. I'm

Post by kfwilson6 » 12 Mar 2018, 10:05

riazziea wrote:
29 Jul 2017, 15:06
I believe that it has to do with how the writer and narrorator are speaking. If the book is in first person and is more towards the conversational side of things, then I'm would seem appropriate. If it's more of a general telling or explanation I am seems to fit. Also when writing dialogue, I'm should be used because that is the normal vernacular and having someone say "I am" would sound strange. It really all depends on the context of the phrases.
Great explanation. I completely agree with this response. I can't say I noticed this issue but when I thought about the way I actually speak I would say "I'm". If you are writing formally, you should not use contractions at all such as in an academic paper. I agree that in the context of this novel, I'm probably was more fitting. I have read some very stilted dialogue and I didn't find it that off putting in this novel. It did sound a bit more formal than how a teenage boy would typically speak.

User avatar
Posts: 44
Joined: 25 Jan 2018, 21:20
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 13
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jamertin2963.html
Latest Review: Superhighway by Alex Fayman

Post by jamertin2963 » 18 Mar 2018, 09:23

This wasn't the only contraction that was mostly avoided in this book, and I think the lack of contractions made the dialogue clunky fairly frequently.

User avatar
Posts: 295
Joined: 15 Feb 2018, 11:11
2018 Reading Goal: 100
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 40
Favorite Book: Trip to Adele
Currently Reading: Split Adam
Bookshelf Size: 158
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-mamalui.html
Latest Review: Devilish by Tricia Barr
Reading Device: 1400697484
Location: Africa

Post by mamalui » 19 Mar 2018, 07:14

Since they both have the same meaning I didn't mind much. But I guess one sound casual and the other more official.
No idea is a bad idea.

Life is what happens to you while you are busy making other plans.

User avatar
Posts: 284
Joined: 16 Jan 2018, 17:12
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 34
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-misael.html
Latest Review: Evenfall by Imonlega Ebehi

Post by Misael » 03 Apr 2018, 06:43

I feel that the use of the former looks good when writing a letter and the latter is commonly used in oral communication.

User avatar
Posts: 228
Joined: 15 Apr 2017, 12:02
Currently Reading: Island Games
Bookshelf Size: 32
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-briennaij.html
Latest Review: The Sword Swallower and a Chico Kid by Gary Robinson

Post by BriennaiJ » 04 Apr 2018, 16:06

I'd have to agree. Formal writing would be for a formal paper. However, a book taking place entirely in the first person would simply not have the same amount of formality.

User avatar
Posts: 131
Joined: 14 May 2018, 18:35
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 14
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-chupke07.html
Latest Review: The Girl Who Knew Da Vinci by Belle Ami

Post by chupke07 » 21 Jun 2018, 06:43

I agree and even mentioned it in my review. Some of the conversational language used is too formal and is distracting because he is supposed to be a native English speaker from a city.

User avatar
Posts: 72
Joined: 01 Jun 2018, 04:25
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 18
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-storm.html
Latest Review: Guilt by David Taylor Black

Post by Storm+ » 27 Jun 2018, 18:35

If this was an academic paper or something, I would prefer the use of "I am" because it seems more professional. However, when a character is speaking in a story, regardless of whether it is to the reader or another character, I believe it's better to use the more conversational "I'm."

Posts: 76
Joined: 20 Jun 2018, 21:24
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 6
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dbulkley.html
Latest Review: Seer by Larry Austin

Post by dbulkley » 03 Aug 2018, 11:43

I don't have a strong opinion about either and not sure hows it's annoying one or another...

Post Reply

Return to “Discuss "Superhighway" by Alex Fayman”