How much science with your fiction?

Discuss the June 2017 Book of the Month, Superhighway by Alex Fayman. Superhighway is the first book in the Superhighway Trilogy, so feel free to use this forum to discuss not only the first book but also the other books in the series.

View Superhighway on Bookshelves
User avatar
Posts: 7
Joined: 14 Jun 2017, 08:48
Currently Reading: Strong Heart
Bookshelf Size: 4

Re: How much science with your fiction?

Post by ReadersCode » 16 Jun 2017, 23:40

For me, adding a touch of science in a fictional story is wonderful because sometimes it explain how it happened in the story even it is imaginary.

User avatar
Posts: 216
Joined: 19 Aug 2016, 15:58
2017 Reading Goal: 0
Currently Reading: Great Expectations
Bookshelf Size: 47
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "The pact with the Devil" by Robert J. DeLuca

Post by Elaine5 » 17 Jun 2017, 05:14

I agree with khusnick ... just enough science for the fiction to make sense. I want to believe in the possibility of the fictional events.
Latest Review: "The pact with the Devil" by Robert J. DeLuca

User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: 22 Oct 2015, 10:47
Currently Reading: Heart of anger
Bookshelf Size: 254
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: Double Exit by Pat S. Clarke

Post by greenstripedgiraffe » 19 Jun 2017, 10:59

khusnick wrote:I like when the science is included to an extent. I don't like extensive explanations with terminology that I can't understand. I just want the fiction to make a little bit of sense. A brief but helpful answer as to how things work in the book is all I need.
I'm with you. I want the science to at least sound plausible (to my unscientific mind), but i don't want huge amounts of explanation that I can't understand anyway.
"no one down here" --- Up the Down Staircase

Posts: 827
Joined: 13 May 2013, 13:43
2018 Reading Goal: 52
2017 Reading Goal: 52
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 30
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 90
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 134
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: Betrayal of Justice by Mark M. Bello

Post by Scerakor » 20 Jun 2017, 19:16

I am a scientist by background and education. For that reason (or maybe at least enhanced by it) I am extremely happy when my sci-fi has a healthy dose of real, properly researched, science that is readily apparent in the books themselves. For me, it adds a level of realism that the book wouldn't have otherwise. What I love even more is where the science is so real (or the research is so real in another genre) that even I have a hard time seeing where reality ends and the fiction begins.

User avatar
Posts: 329
Joined: 13 May 2016, 18:50
2018 Reading Goal: 52
2017 Reading Goal: 120
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 16
Bookshelf Size: 124
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "Wrong Turn, Right Guy" by Haylie B. Fox
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by e-tasana-williams » 21 Jun 2017, 16:05

I love to have science included in the sci-fi story. The most entertaining reads for me are the ones that pose how current science *may* lead to the discovery of future scientific possibilities, and a story that can be developed from this possible situation. I love to read how "quaint" or "misunderstood" current science is, because it reminds us that we don't have all the answers, and never will. Progress continues. It may not be linear, but it continues nonetheless. Thank you for the thought-provoking question!
Once you learn to read, you will be forever free ~ Frederick Douglas
Latest Review: "Wrong Turn, Right Guy" by Haylie B. Fox

User avatar
Posts: 298
Joined: 21 Jan 2017, 18:30
Currently Reading: Oil and Marble
Bookshelf Size: 200
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: Ocean Echoes by Sheila Hurst

Post by Lest92 » 27 Jun 2017, 05:38

I don't often read sci-fi, but when I do, I appreciate a scientific explanation for whatever happens - I can bear with biology, physics will escape me at some point, but it doesn't matter as long as there is an explanation for me to wrap my head around. Anthony Skelton's Asymptote had an explanation for the main character's time travelling machine which made sense to me, and if I remember correctly, Jurassic Park also explained the resurrected dinosaurs in a way that seemed plausible.

User avatar
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 May 2017, 09:09
2017 Reading Goal: 40
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 20
Bookshelf Size: 14
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "Don't Let It Show" by Randy Boucher

Post by joshfender » 02 Jul 2017, 01:52

I'd appreciate it if the science was explained in any way, but it won't affect my view on the sci-fi if they keep it mysterious.
Latest Review: "Don't Let It Show" by Randy Boucher

User avatar
Posts: 166
Joined: 08 Jun 2017, 08:22
2017 Reading Goal: 0
Currently Reading: Escape
Bookshelf Size: 63
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "A Faithful Son" by Michael Scott Garvin

Post by Kinnera » 15 Jul 2017, 06:06

As a science student, I prefer the author not go overboard with explanations because mostly science fiction has more than a splash of fiction and I'd rather not spend my time picking out errors I can find. I enjoy my fix as much but do like it more fiction than science.
Latest Review: "A Faithful Son" by Michael Scott Garvin

User avatar
Posts: 540
Joined: 24 Jun 2017, 06:52
2018 Reading Goal: 150
2017 Reading Goal: 20
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 24
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 80
Favorite Book: <a href=" ... 03345">The Darziods' Stone</a>
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 135
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: Triplicity by J Mercer

Post by ritah » 16 Jul 2017, 08:16

I love science so the more science incorporated into the book the better.
Latest Review: Triplicity by J Mercer

User avatar
Posts: 223
Joined: 14 Jul 2017, 15:52
2017 Reading Goal: 70
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 21
Currently Reading: The Girl Who Knew da Vinci
Bookshelf Size: 60
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "Escape" by Belle Ami
Reading Device: 1400699169

Post by Pm7lucas » 23 Jul 2017, 18:49

It doesn't really bother me if the science isn't fully explained when I am reading a sci-fi story, but I do enjoy it when there is an explanation even if it is highly technical.

Paula :D
"I think therefore I am" - Rene Descartes
Latest Review: "Escape" by Belle Ami

User avatar
Posts: 18
Joined: 28 Jun 2017, 17:34
2017 Reading Goal: 10
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 670
Bookshelf Size: 106
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "Murders in Progress" by Eldon Cene

Post by ValEtt » 31 Jul 2017, 00:43

It's funny I should run across this question, because I was just looking at some of the forum topics for Superhighway and thinking, "Man, even this discussion has too much science for me." I definitely like light or 'soft' scifi. Like somebody else mentioned, the -fi part of scifi implies that the science is advanced enough to necessitate fiction. In my mind, that means that it can't be explained in a way that would be clear to me, or else it would just be fiction. I prefer to know as much or as little as the author wants to share, and then just buckle in for the ride.
Latest Review: "Murders in Progress" by Eldon Cene

User avatar
Posts: 346
Joined: 05 Jun 2017, 11:20
2018 Reading Goal: 101
2017 Reading Goal: 100
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 0
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 59
Currently Reading: The Masked City
Bookshelf Size: 5466
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "STARLESS and Bible Black" by Gerard DiLeo

Post by Afuglsan » 31 Jul 2017, 12:31

Science helps me understand foreign concepts. If I know what science should be included, however, and it isn't, I get irritated.
Latest Review: "STARLESS and Bible Black" by Gerard DiLeo

User avatar
Posts: 107
Joined: 18 Aug 2016, 11:01
Currently Reading: A Dance with Dragons
Bookshelf Size: 50
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "The Understanding" by Dennis Pennefather

Post by Rachel1019 » 09 Aug 2017, 16:10

I think that it makes the fiction much more believable when the author uses logical explanations to explain it. I think there is a point though that makes it too technical. But I thought Superhighway did a good job of making it believable, but not boring.
Latest Review: "The Understanding" by Dennis Pennefather

User avatar
geoffrey ngoima
Posts: 777
Joined: 11 Jul 2017, 06:41
2017 Reading Goal: 50
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 44
Bookshelf Size: 110
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "The Little Girl Inside Owning My Role in My Own Pain" by Tonya Barbee
Reading Device: B00UB76290

Post by geoffrey ngoima » 26 Aug 2017, 09:50

I like it 50/50, I think science explains and is an integral part of life, in fact, it is life, and the spirits, let's bump it up to 100% then
To posit that the war brings us closer to faith is a sleight of hand that makes fools of us all. "There Are Only Atheists in Fox Holes"~ Michael Carson
Latest Review: "The Little Girl Inside Owning My Role in My Own Pain" by Tonya Barbee

User avatar
Ashley Simon
Posts: 267
Joined: 08 Sep 2017, 18:44
2017 Reading Goal: 20
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 65
Currently Reading: Zero K
Bookshelf Size: 141
Reviewer Page:
Latest Review: "Bible Answers" by Roseline Gaston Rabouin

Post by Ashley Simon » 20 Sep 2017, 11:33

I tend to prefer more science than fiction. I have to be convinced in order to step into the world of the story. Otherwise, I can't settle in and enjoy it. I know lots of sci-fi buffs who would disagree, though - it's all personal preference!
Latest Review: "Bible Answers" by Roseline Gaston Rabouin

Post Reply

Return to “Discuss "Superhighway" by Alex Fayman”