Review by Nmesoma -- Sigfried’s Smelly Socks!

This forum is for volunteer reviews by members of our review team. These reviews are done voluntarily by the reviewers and are published in this forum, separate from the official professional reviews. These reviews are kept separate primarily because the same book may be reviewed by many different reviewers.
Post Reply
User avatar
Nmesoma
Posts: 118
Joined: 24 May 2018, 10:45
2018 Reading Goal: 30
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 26
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 24
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-nmesoma.html
Latest Review: Dragon Born by Ela Lourenco

Review by Nmesoma -- Sigfried’s Smelly Socks!

Post by Nmesoma » 16 Jun 2018, 09:06

[Following is a volunteer review of "Sigfried’s Smelly Socks!" by Len Foley.]
Book Cover
1 out of 4 stars
Share This Review


REVIEW OF SIGFRIED’S SMELLY SOCKS! BY LEN FOLEY

The story is a really short novel about a kid wondering what makes his socks and books smell so bad. It’s about all the disgusting things that had been done to his socks, all the disgusting misfortunes that had befallen his books. The phrase the author rightly quoted in the beginning, “something stinks about this book” covers everything about the entire story. It’s all about how bad his book and socks reeks, though he did promise to wash his awfully smelling socks in the end.

When I first saw the children’s book, I thought it would be comical at the least, something that could actually draw and hold a child’s attention. The book is short enough to hold a kid’s attention to the end, if it can draw it first. To me, I’ll rightly say I saw no point in writing the novel; what was a kid to gain in the end, is it good enough for a bedtime story, or is it more of a ‘read-at-school’ type? Most children’s books are creative if not comical, to help build a child’s imaginative stance or at least increase their grammatical sense. This book, while it is no doubt that it can help in a child’s grammar (as any nursery book would), won’t be of much use to a child.

Parents would rarely like it too in my opinion, and that’s chiefly because there is no moral, social or otherwise embedded in the story. At the end of the story Sigfried agreed to wash his smelly socks…in the toilet! I didn’t know if that was supposed to be a joke because it certainly didn’t have me laughing (neither did the kid I forced to listen while I read respond positively). I started searching vigorously on the information the book was trying to pass on or imbibe in children, there was none. There was zero element of creativity, information or morals the book could pass on to children and I think it would make the story a big turn-off to parents.

The graphics in the book was colorful and vibrant, and illustrated the story the author was telling. And I would say the age range that the book was designed for would be 1-3 years of age. As much as it pains me to criticize someone’s work, this book is much like a fictional and comical mistake.

I would rate the book ‘1 out of 4’ stars. There just isn’t much that would draw a child’s imagination or make a parent want to read it to his/her child, whatever time of day it happens to be. Children’s books should aspire to leave the children with positive creative and imaginative sense while endearing to improve their grammar, social skills and more. I don’t think a book based entirely on smelly things does that for the little ones.

******
Sigfried’s Smelly Socks!
View: on Bookshelves | on Amazon

Like Nmesoma's review? Post a comment saying so!

User avatar
Cotwani
Posts: 351
Joined: 01 Nov 2017, 16:12
2018 Reading Goal: 200
2017 Reading Goal: 200
2018 Reading Goal Completion: 4
2017 Reading Goal Completion: 4
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 129
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cotwani.html
Latest Review: The Sword Swallower and a Chico Kid by Gary Robinson

Post by Cotwani » 20 Jun 2018, 16:41

The last sentence of your review is profound....a book based entirely on smelly things does not leave a child with a positive creative and imaginative sense! I'm sorry the book did not impress you.

User avatar
gen_g
Posts: 749
Joined: 22 Apr 2018, 10:31
Currently Reading: CUT
Bookshelf Size: 32
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-gen-g.html
Latest Review: Best Evidence by Mark S. Osaki

Post by gen_g » 23 Jun 2018, 09:34

Thanks for the review! It is a pity that the book did not live up to your expectations – I am also an avid believer that children's books should be informative and fun, since these books play a major role in language development for them.

User avatar
Laura Bach
Posts: 234
Joined: 25 Mar 2018, 11:32
Favorite Book: The Book Thief
Currently Reading: A Second, Less Capable Head
Bookshelf Size: 529
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-laura-bach.html
Latest Review: Superhighway by Alex Fayman

Post by Laura Bach » 24 Jun 2018, 10:56

I am glad you saw the missing educative side of this book. After all, that's why children should read books.

User avatar
Robinho
Posts: 4
Joined: 15 Jun 2018, 16:56
Bookshelf Size: 0

Post by Robinho » 27 Jun 2018, 18:51

I love your stance on the matter that children's novel should be educational.

User avatar
Robinho
Posts: 4
Joined: 15 Jun 2018, 16:56
Bookshelf Size: 0

Post by Robinho » 27 Jun 2018, 19:05

I love your stance that children's novel should be educational

User avatar
Kendall jojo
Posts: 6
Joined: 14 Jun 2018, 06:52
Bookshelf Size: 0

Post by Kendall jojo » 01 Jul 2018, 04:57

I agree with your review; children's books should be inspirational and educative. The review was great and captured what most writers lack in their works. Thanks for the eye-opening!

Post Reply

Return to “Volunteer Reviews”