Review by FictionLover -- Toxic Side Effect by Sandy Magner

This forum is for volunteer reviews by members of our review team. These reviews are done voluntarily by the reviewers and are published in this forum, separate from the official professional reviews. These reviews are kept separate primarily because the same book may be reviewed by many different reviewers.
Forum rules
Authors and publishers are not able to post replies in the review topics.
Post Reply
User avatar
FictionLover
Posts: 602
Joined: 16 May 2018, 20:50
Favorite Book: If life stinks get your head outta your buts
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 149
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fictionlover.html
Latest Review: Winning the War on Cancer by Sylvie Beljanski
Reading Device: B00HCNHDN0

Review by FictionLover -- Toxic Side Effect by Sandy Magner

Post by FictionLover »

[Following is a volunteer review of "Toxic Side Effect" by Sandy Magner.]
Book Cover
2 out of 4 stars
Share This Review


Toxic Side Effect, the second in a series by Sandy Magner, is a bit of a mystery itself. With a title that sounds like a medical mystery and is listed in the Kindle store as a thriller/suspense novel, I had high hopes for a heart pounding read. However, the level of suspense was not high, and I did not find the novel fit the pacing or plot of a thriller. An amateur sleuth mystery that greets the reader with the foul language of a hard-nosed PI, Jennifer Burns isn't a retired cop, a private investigator, or a former Federal Agent. But she can swear like a sailor, and F-bombs will be dropped. And though most of the novel takes place in the same town, it does not read like a cozy, either. In my opinion, Toxic Side Effect falls between genres, and can’t get up.

The mystery concerns Jennifer’s father, Richard Burns, who is the victim of poisoning, and the search for his killer. At first his wife, Audrey, is suspected. When it is revealed that Richard had a mistress, Maureen, who may have had access to the poison, the focus shifts to her. Jennifer discovers she has a half-brother by this woman and decides to meet her father’s other family while continuing her search for evidence to prove her theory that the mistress did it. The murderer is finally discovered, but not until after a false confession is sent to the police. This confession, which has nothing to do with Jennifer’s skills as a sleuth, points away from its author and seals the fate of the killer.

I read a lot of mysteries, and compared to most other novels, there was a lack of suspects. Indeed, the normally circuitous route followed in most mysteries, as clues are uncovered, various individuals come under suspicion, and are cleared (or not), doesn't happen here. There are only two individuals who are ever suspected, and there is never any real search for evidence because it keeps falling in Jennifer’s lap. Her attempt to get a confession from Maureen is okay by the police, who for some reason are reluctant to question her because she is ill. Apparently, not too ill to send Jennifer to do their job for them.

Though its short length and interesting subplot may appeal to some readers, I found the writing to be marred by serious problems with believability and consistency of plot, and by grammar and formatting errors. Ms. Magner chose to use ellipses ( . . . ) thirty-one separate times. I’ve never seen them used so frequently, and almost every time they were used, they were used incorrectly. There were no missing words, and a period or comma would have done the job.

The opening of the story, where Jennifer is with her mother in the hospital, contains some of the best writing. The author has a talent for describing relationships, including a family in distress and a very unorthodox marriage. The story is at its best with the 3 main characters: Jennifer, Audrey, and Maureen. Although Maureen could be considered a secondary character because she is not present as much as the other two, her name and backstory fill the novel. Other family members were barely mentioned and are one dimensional at best and do little, if anything, to move the story forward. Jennifer’s side kick, Kat, seemed superficial to me, as if her only purpose was to make unkind and judgmental remarks. I liked the character of Audrey Burns the best, and I felt the description of how she adapted to her marriage to be unique. I liked the fact that she made the best decision for her own peace of mind, and lived with it.

Though I considered the beginning the most compelling part of the novel, it was ruined by hyperbole. Ms. Magner’s depiction of Jennifer tearing into the hospital, running through the waiting room yelling and looking into curtained-off areas, was over the top. Come on, who careens through an ER that way? In these days of HIPAA privacy rules and gun crime, she would never get past the check-in desk. She even yells at the doctor who is trying to save her father’s life. Later on, when she thinks the nurses are whispering about her, I just wanted to laugh. Anyone who has had loved ones in the hospital knows that nurses are so over worked they don’t have time to stand around whispering. You’re lucky if you ever see two nurses in the same spot, never mind wasting time gossiping about someone they might possibly recognize from years ago.

The suspense that should be building during these hospital scenes, as we try to figure out what has happened, falls flat as we are spoon fed the diagnosis and the first suspect. I was impressed that the doctor could diagnose cyanide poisoning so quickly. When he makes the assumption that Jennifer’s mother did it, I just couldn’t buy it.
Then there are the inconsistencies in the plot. On page 153 (or location, as the Kindle calls it) Jennifer is recalling the only other time she has seen her father in such bad physical shape: when his affair with Maureen was initially exposed, and he and her mother began to fight. After months, the fighting ends. Then Jennifer asks herself: “Had mom decided to accept his relationship with Maureen, or had he promised to end the relationship? It was unclear to me . . .”

Although her mother doesn’t come clean for several chapters, on the next page, Jennifer decides that her father has continued to see Maureen, and uses this as the reason to suspect that her mother poisoned him. A few pages after that (location 169), Jennifer calls her friend Kat, and Kat’s dialog tells us she knows about the affair. At this point, Jennifer doesn’t know that the affair has persisted for years, so how does Kat know? The suspicion that Jennifer’s mother poisoned her father for revenge takes up a good part of the initial chapters of the book and pushes Jennifer to investigate, yet she doesn’t know it to be true until much later in the story.

There are other problems like this, including the unflattering manner in which the police are portrayed. I don’t want to go into any more detail because I don’t want to spoil the whole book. However, I think many mystery readers would agree with me and find this novel lacking. I rate it a 2 out of 4 Stars.

Despite my criticism, some readers might enjoy it. It is a short book and a fast read. I finished it in about 3 hours. I didn’t have an affinity for Jennifer, yet I did not find her unlikable, and the question of who killed Richard Burns kept me reading. If you are a fan of light, fluffy mysteries, this might appeal to you, especially if you are not too particular about forensics, witnesses, or, you know, actual police procedures.

******
Toxic Side Effect
View: on Bookshelves | on Amazon

Like FictionLover's review? Post a comment saying so!
"I love reading another reader’s list of favorites. Even when I find I do not share their tastes or predilections, I am provoked to compare, contrast, and contradict. It is a most healthy exercise, and one altogether fruitful." T.S. Eliot
User avatar
Helen_Combe
Posts: 2493
Joined: 18 Feb 2018, 12:17
Favorite Book: The Martian
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 193
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-helen-combe.html
Latest Review: And The Trees Began To Move by Lisa Gammon Olson
Reading Device: B00M4L4MFC

Post by Helen_Combe »

’Toxic Side Effect falls between genres, and can’t get up’. Great line 😄
I read this book too and we’ve both come to the same conclusions. It just wasn’t realistic and there weren’t enough suspects.
Thanks for the detailed review. You even you even counted the ellipses, impressive!
A thesaurus is necessary, essential, indispensable, vital, crucial and fundamental.
User avatar
FictionLover
Posts: 602
Joined: 16 May 2018, 20:50
Favorite Book: If life stinks get your head outta your buts
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 149
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fictionlover.html
Latest Review: Winning the War on Cancer by Sylvie Beljanski
Reading Device: B00HCNHDN0

Post by FictionLover »

Helen_Combe wrote: 17 Jun 2018, 03:36 ’Toxic Side Effect falls between genres, and can’t get up’. Great line 😄
I read this book too and we’ve both come to the same conclusions. It just wasn’t realistic and there weren’t enough suspects.
Thanks for the detailed review. You even you even counted the ellipses, impressive!
Hi Helen,
Yes, we seem to agree on many of the books. If you read a lot of mysteries, this one just does not hold up.

And those ellipses made me nuts! Now I see that self-published authors have a tendency of overusing them. Those, and exclamation points. Some authors love them!

(Sorry it took me so long to get back to you! I am not being notified about comments on the reviews.)
"I love reading another reader’s list of favorites. Even when I find I do not share their tastes or predilections, I am provoked to compare, contrast, and contradict. It is a most healthy exercise, and one altogether fruitful." T.S. Eliot
User avatar
Helen_Combe
Posts: 2493
Joined: 18 Feb 2018, 12:17
Favorite Book: The Martian
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 193
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-helen-combe.html
Latest Review: And The Trees Began To Move by Lisa Gammon Olson
Reading Device: B00M4L4MFC

Post by Helen_Combe »

FictionLover wrote: 07 Aug 2018, 08:38
Helen_Combe wrote: 17 Jun 2018, 03:36 ’Toxic Side Effect falls between genres, and can’t get up’. Great line 😄
I read this book too and we’ve both come to the same conclusions. It just wasn’t realistic and there weren’t enough suspects.
Thanks for the detailed review. You even you even counted the ellipses, impressive!
Hi Helen,
Yes, we seem to agree on many of the books. If you read a lot of mysteries, this one just does not hold up.

And those ellipses made me nuts! Now I see that self-published authors have a tendency of overusing them. Those, and exclamation points. Some authors love them!

(Sorry it took me so long to get back to you! I am not being notified about comments on the reviews.)
Oh no worries, I also went through a period where my notifications suddenly switched off. Very frustrating. Glad we share the same opinion of the book. Thanks for posting.
A thesaurus is necessary, essential, indispensable, vital, crucial and fundamental.
User avatar
FictionLover
Posts: 602
Joined: 16 May 2018, 20:50
Favorite Book: If life stinks get your head outta your buts
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 149
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fictionlover.html
Latest Review: Winning the War on Cancer by Sylvie Beljanski
Reading Device: B00HCNHDN0

Post by FictionLover »

Helen_Combe wrote: 07 Aug 2018, 15:23
FictionLover wrote: 07 Aug 2018, 08:38
Helen_Combe wrote: 17 Jun 2018, 03:36 ’Toxic Side Effect falls between genres, and can’t get up’. Great line 😄
I read this book too and we’ve both come to the same conclusions. It just wasn’t realistic and there weren’t enough suspects.
Thanks for the detailed review. You even you even counted the ellipses, impressive!
Hi Helen,
Yes, we seem to agree on many of the books. If you read a lot of mysteries, this one just does not hold up.

And those ellipses made me nuts! Now I see that self-published authors have a tendency of overusing them. Those, and exclamation points. Some authors love them!

(Sorry it took me so long to get back to you! I am not being notified about comments on the reviews.)
Oh no worries, I also went through a period where my notifications suddenly switched off. Very frustrating. Glad we share the same opinion of the book. Thanks for posting.
:tiphat: :tiphat:
"I love reading another reader’s list of favorites. Even when I find I do not share their tastes or predilections, I am provoked to compare, contrast, and contradict. It is a most healthy exercise, and one altogether fruitful." T.S. Eliot
User avatar
FictionLover
Posts: 602
Joined: 16 May 2018, 20:50
Favorite Book: If life stinks get your head outta your buts
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 149
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fictionlover.html
Latest Review: Winning the War on Cancer by Sylvie Beljanski
Reading Device: B00HCNHDN0

Post by FictionLover »

You're Welcome
"I love reading another reader’s list of favorites. Even when I find I do not share their tastes or predilections, I am provoked to compare, contrast, and contradict. It is a most healthy exercise, and one altogether fruitful." T.S. Eliot
User avatar
JHuschle519
Posts: 184
Joined: 18 Jul 2018, 01:20
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 57
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jhuschle519.html
Latest Review: End of the Last Great Kingdom by Victor Rose

Post by JHuschle519 »

Thank you for this very thorough review. Despite the fact that you didn't like the book, you still managed to point out the few things about it that you found enjoyable. I personally am not a fan of a book that tries to be a cross between too many different genres, and from what you've described, that is what we have here. I definitely think I'll be passing on this one. Thanks again for the great review.
User avatar
FictionLover
Posts: 602
Joined: 16 May 2018, 20:50
Favorite Book: If life stinks get your head outta your buts
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 149
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fictionlover.html
Latest Review: Winning the War on Cancer by Sylvie Beljanski
Reading Device: B00HCNHDN0

Post by FictionLover »

JHuschle519 wrote: 16 Oct 2018, 07:45 Thank you for this very thorough review. Despite the fact that you didn't like the book, you still managed to point out the few things about it that you found enjoyable. I personally am not a fan of a book that tries to be a cross between too many different genres, and from what you've described, that is what we have here. I definitely think I'll be passing on this one. Thanks again for the great review.
Thanks for your comment!

I am a mystery lover and have read hundreds of mysteries, many by the greats of the genre. I will always read to see 'whodunit', but this one just has too many plot holes to count as good, in my opinion.

:tiphat:
"I love reading another reader’s list of favorites. Even when I find I do not share their tastes or predilections, I am provoked to compare, contrast, and contradict. It is a most healthy exercise, and one altogether fruitful." T.S. Eliot
Post Reply

Return to “Volunteer Reviews”