Why Do We Re-Read Our Favorite Books as Kids ?
- avid reader28
- Posts: 109
- Joined: 10 May 2015, 21:29
- Bookshelf Size: 65
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-avid-reader28.html
Why Do We Re-Read Our Favorite Books as Kids ?
" As an avid young reader, I tore through every Nancy Drew book — both the originals and the cheap paperback updates — twice, experiencing my favorites up to five or six times. Even more sacred was my semi-annual ritual of re-experiencing all of L.M. Montgomery’s major novels, including the entire eight-book Anne of Green Gables series, alternating with my personal favorite, Emily of New Moon, and its two sequels. For weeks I would go back to Prince Edward Island and dwell with those characters. This journey was supplemented by a solemn re-reading of The Lord of the Rings every four or five years, an experience so intense that my dreams would begin to look like Peter Jackson’s set designs, even before those designs existed. As I got older, I switched out some of these childhood classics for adult ones, going back through the “Austen six” again and again, while also making a point of re-watching my favorite Austen miniseries and the Lord of the Rings films in marathon fashion.
Yet the last Austen novel I re-read was in early 2010 — two apartments, three jobs, and five years ago. Until this week, I hadn’t sat down and re-read a favorite book for pleasure since, and my re-watching had slowed to a trickle, too. I have given up a treasured part of my cultural life, a staple since I was in elementary school. So why did I stop? And what have I lost?
The answer to the first question is complicated. The obvious, superficial, answer is time and priorities. Those re-reading binges of childhood and even college were enabled by long summers, school vacations, family trips. And they offered a pleasant reprieve from the stresses of class-required reading and writing, a chance to reclaim those activities for myself. Now, almost all the reading I do is for a different homework — the social kind. Even popular series like The Hunger Games and the Sookie Stackhouse series make my reading list at least partly to keep me “up on the conversation.” I walk around with a stack of books I “need” to read, as well as a full Instapaper queue and a stream of essays, articles, and stories by friends that I genuinely want to read to help them evaluate and offer support.
And when I am reading for pleasure, I’m often tearing through new books, hoping to find “the one” that will remind me of reading a Montgomery book or an Austen book, and coming up short (well, with the lone recent exception of Ferrante).
I’ve come to understand that I’ll rarely experience that first rush of discovery again, and perhaps that’s the problem with re-reading. It reminds us both of where we’ve been and where we can’t go again. Once, when I was in elementary school, I sat on my carpet and grabbed Little House on the Prairie, looking forward to an indulgent re-read. But I couldn’t do it — it was too clearly written for children, too simple. It no longer had the power it once had to pull me into its world.
That feeling explains the trepidation that accompanied my downloading Emily of New Moon onto my Nook this week. It’s a sophisticated children’s book, sophisticated because it’s thematically preoccupied with the question that brought me to its pages. In fact, its heroine regularly reconsiders her own poetry and diary entries and burns them, seeing them as trash, when months ago she thought they were resplendent. It never stops. Emily spends most of the book writing out her frustrations in letters to her dead father, “But when she again tried to write a letter to her father she found that it no longer meant anything to her…. A certain door of life was shut behind her and could not be reopened.”
Re-reading Emily itself provides that reminder of doors that have been shut behind me. The book once seemed dense, and now it seems light. But it also gave me insights I didn’t expect. As Nabokov famously said,
The element of time does not really enter in a first contact with a painting. In reading a book, we must have time to acquaint ourselves with it. We have no physical organ (as we have the eye in regard to painting) that takes in the whole picture and then can enjoy its details. But at a second, or third, or fourth reading we do, in a sense, behave towards a book as we do towards a painting.
A re-read allows us to fly over the pages and absorb more of the secondary meaning of the book, rather than just its initial plot, characters, structures. But it also means a suspension of our willing disbelief, an understanding that what we’re seeing is a false creation. Anyone who has seen his or her favorite band in concert multiple times on the same tour might recognize such a feeling. The first show you’re too euphoric to hear anything but the music and see anything but the showmanship; the second show you start to notice the choreography of certain moments, the little things the roadies are doing to make the show seem effortless, the way the singer sounds strained. You know a bit more about the band’s way of working and being, but the curtain of magic has been lifted.
This time while reading Emily of New Moon, I recognized every single minor character, every event, and relished re-encountering them. Yet something changed, too: I found myself thinking less about the novel’s heroine, while being more and more curious about the novel’s author, about both the idealism and bitterness she put onto the page, how she accomplished her tone, and what her emotional and literary sources were. In other words, I saw Emily more as a crafted construction than as I used to see her, which was as a friend and spirit guide.
But that doesn’t mean the book lost its healing or inspirational power for me; rather, that power’s locus had changed. The power came not from the story itself, but from the writer’s ability to create such a singular and charming heroine, down to details like Emily’s high forehead and overactive imagination. Similarly, when I get teary at the end of Pride and Prejudice after four or five reads, it’s not because Lizzy is so amazing or because she and Darcy are finally together — in fact, I see her faults quite clearly now. Instead it’s because I’m amazed that Jane Austen created them, moved them around, and made me still care, even if I see the strings being pulled.
Re-reading offers something that few other cultural experiences do, really: a mix of gentle stability and sharp new insight. In childhood, “as we become accustomed to a world in which change is the only real constant, the familiarity of the book at bedtime is something to cling to. Adults aren’t immune to those feelings, either,” Hephzibah Anderson wrote last year. “Except that often, that’s not quite the case. We notice fresh details. Our interpretations change as we evolve.”
Throughout My Life in Middlemarch, Rebecca Mead writes about how with each read of her favorite book, her character identifications and sympathies change. Indeed, re-reading means constantly assessing one’s own growth and loss of previous innocence, which can be spiritually gratifying but also painful. But that mix of ease with struggle, of nestling into the familiar while learning hard truths, is the core of any kind of spiritually infused practice, whether it’s meditation or a creative pursuit.
Taking the time to re-experience the art we loved best in our past can be a way of spending time with ourselves, and though its rewards are mostly unseen, that may make them all the more important to seek out. Now that I’m done with the first Emily book, I plan to re-read the whole series, and try to work my favorite books back into my life, without being afraid of losing “productive” time "
What do you think of the article ? and why do you re-read your Favorite childhood books ?
- LivreAmour217
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: 02 Oct 2014, 12:42
- Favorite Book: Ditto
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 294
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-livreamour217.html
- Latest Review: Island Games by Caleb J. Boyer
- DarkestbeforeDawn
- Posts: 157
- Joined: 29 Dec 2015, 03:05
- Currently Reading: The Idiot
- Bookshelf Size: 15
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-darkestbeforedawn.html
- Latest Review: "Padanaram Village" by Jack Burbank
- Taylor Razzani
- Posts: 319
- Joined: 08 Jan 2016, 19:56
- Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 59294">The Shadow of the Wind (The Cemetery of Forgotten Books)</a>
- Currently Reading: The Bachman Books
- Bookshelf Size: 56
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-taylor-razzani.html
- Latest Review: The Hand Bringer by Christopher J. Penington
- williams_Joseph
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 26 Aug 2018, 02:08
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 2
- DATo
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 5796
- Joined: 31 Dec 2011, 07:54
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Thanks for finding and posting your response. I had missed this article when the OP first presented it to the forums. I found it to be an excellent read and had you not posted your comment I would have missed it entirely.williams_Joseph wrote: ↑26 Aug 2018, 02:30 I actually re-read to get lost in the old feelings and memories of childhood. the nostalgic feelings,so incredible. sometimes I re-learn things I'd forgotten already. thanks for the article!
I think the most reasonable explanation for the difference in one's ability to relate to a book as we did when younger, as mentioned in the article, is because we are now affected by all that has transpired in our lives since we read the book as children. We are a product of our experiences and our world views have probably changed dramatically since we were children. I often encounter those old John Wayne movies and others of that period and think, "How could I have ever taken these movies seriously back then?" Everything about them seems so melodramatic, contrived and inconsistent with reality now. I suppose the same thing occurs with books; however, there are some books, I suppose they are the ones we refer to as "classics", which somehow manage to withstand the changing tides of our lives and speak to us just as forcefully and artistically as they did when we were children.
I'm sure you are correct when you mention nostalgia. Sometimes we read a book or hear an old song from our past and we can be transported directly back to the state of mind we were in when we last heard it. I am from the midwest, but many, many years ago I had motored to California on a vacation and I remember being on the Ventura freeway (only time in my life) when the song Ventura Highway by the group America came on the radio. It was an amazing experience, much like an epiphany, when I realized where I was and what was playing on the radio. It was a beautiful spring morning and I didn't have a care in the world. Today when I hear that song the same feeling washes over me. I can still feel the cool breeze blowing, the freshness of the morning air and recall the beautiful scenery as though I am back in that car.
/
― Steven Wright
- Sharill Rasowo
- In It Together VIP
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: 25 Aug 2018, 08:54
- Currently Reading: Worldlines
- Bookshelf Size: 210
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sharill-rasowo.html
- Latest Review: Kalayla by Jeannie Nicholas