1984
Authors and publishers are not able to post replies in the review topics.
- Artdude
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 01 Mar 2011, 15:08
- Bookshelf Size: 0
1984
But why? and does it have any significance to today (like everybody says)?
The themes examined upon first glance are rather seperate from the world we inhabit today. The dystopian novel, or indeed any kind of fictional dystopia is a considerably vexed one, when trying to relate it to modern society. We have no kind of repression or ultimate control imposed upon us like the characters in 1984. We have rules and laws and restraints, but that is how civilisation works. That is quite simply the only way in which to control and moderate a successful and compatable society. To this end, we suffer nothing like the conscription Winston faces in 1984.
On the other hand, the rules and laws (which I previously suggested are integral to successful civilisation), are often pushed too far. The tight control over pensions, jobs, health care and education are often overly controlling. This is one of the key features of Dystopia or dictatorship -ultimate control over everything which is essential to human life. By controlling these things, our governments are fuelling revolution/rebellion, which gives them the opportunity to suppress further, and so it continues.
We have not reached this stage yet. We are arguably far from it. But look at how we can be so easily controlled now - Billboards in city streets (Times Square for example,) Ipods, interactive television, internet on the phone, the sudden rise of the IPAD. Anyone ever considered how similar an IPAD is to a telescreen in 1984? It's not long before we have Ipads which can be mounted on the wall. How long - therefore - before the interaction becomes two-way. How long before people can interact with YOU through the ipad. These are not implausible suggestions. To this end, 1984 is a warning of things to come. It gives us a glimpse into a fictional, but possible world.
In summary, it has some significance, but it truly is limited. It's only function is a warning, (let's face it, your not reading it for enjoyment. The writing style is so bland and uninteresting.) But this warning is based on the 'what if's', the 'could possibly's', and the 'it is plausible that's. To this end, 1984 is not only unenjoyable in writing style, but has realtively little significance on today's society - given that everything is predicts is based on quite fundamental gambled outcomes.
What do you think?
- Maud Fitch
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: 28 Feb 2011, 23:05
- Favorite Book: The Eyre Affair
- Bookshelf Size: 0
"It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself--anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face...; was itself a punishable offense. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime..."
- George Orwell, 1984, Book 1, Chapter 5.
Some say it predicted FaceBook.....
- Fran
- Posts: 28072
- Joined: 10 Aug 2009, 12:46
- Favorite Book: Anna Karenina
- Currently Reading: Hide and Seek
- Bookshelf Size: 1208
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fran.html
- Reading Device: B00I15SB16
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon/biggrin.gif)
What brought 1984 to mind was the reports on the News of the World phone scandal ... makes you wonder just how far off Orwell was!
IMO Orwell outlines what would be nirvana for any totalitarian regimé or corporation, the ability to watch everyone, all the time ... and the real beauty was you didn't need to watch all the time you just had to convince people that they could be being watched. The process whereby Winston outlines how someone starts apparently voluntarily to control their own thoughts I found truly chilling.
I agree with Artdude, 1984 is not an easy read, nor is it particularly well written but Orwell had superb foresight & turned a forensic eye on society. IMO both Animal Farm & 1984 should be up there among the most important books ever written.
The ease with which so called intelligent human beings can be manipulated has been shown over and over again and we don't need to look too far to see how society can be hijacked by totalitarian forces.
"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." Wendell Phillips
A world is born again that never dies.
- My Home by Clive James
- StephenKingman
- Posts: 13994
- Joined: 29 Dec 2009, 12:00
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-stephenkingman.html
It makes me laugh how people think that with the closure of the NOTW paper that its the end of the matter- the paper will simply 'rebrand' and be published under a slightly different matter, same sh!t different name. And all the responsible journalists will walk away scot free because you cannot take a defunct paper to the court for libel. 1984 remains, like Animal Farm, as relevant today as it ever was..
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: 07 Jul 2011, 12:52
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Bighuey
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 22451
- Joined: 02 Apr 2011, 21:24
- Currently Reading: Return to the Dirt
- Bookshelf Size: 2
- Artdude
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 01 Mar 2011, 15:08
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Anyhow - everything people have posted has been really interesting. However, I think it has to be added:
The media, politics and technology are often - as you all correctly point out - used for bad or manipulative ends. The News of the World scandal recently is a good example. However, everyone tends to focus on the bad bits, and forget the amazing things about technology. Without our technology as it is, we couldn't televise events such as the olympics, music festivals, or party political broadcasts. Most people are probably choking on their coffee at this point, but I'm serious. Party political broadcasts, and other election campaigns are the most informative that they've been in the history of government. They are sometimes used for bad - but look at how well informed you are about politics in todays society, considering the immense amount of ignorance in preceding centuries. Everyone in the modern world has potential access to an informed and educated decision about how their country is run. This is a good thing surely? Similarly, the rise in technology has increased human solidarity - our communication is the most efficient, most accessible, and most enjoyable it has been in the history of language. I would argue that this has increased human understanding of other cultures and other countries. This I see as good.
So yes, it has been used for bad, but I would suggest that there are numerous good things to say about the rise in technology.
- Fran
- Posts: 28072
- Joined: 10 Aug 2009, 12:46
- Favorite Book: Anna Karenina
- Currently Reading: Hide and Seek
- Bookshelf Size: 1208
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fran.html
- Reading Device: B00I15SB16
I find myself agreeing with your views on the positive aspects of technology.
However, while information is much more readily available, in western countries at least, I am not sure how many ordinary citizens take the time or make the effort to inform themselves. So many seem to be happy on a diet of shallow, irrelevant nonsense about the doings of so called celebs or alternatively take blatant racist nonsense as gospel just because it's on the front page of some cheap tabloid or said with total conviction by a news channel desperate to fill the hours of broadcasting time. Few people seem to have the attention span to actually delve deep into issues, to actually question and weed out the motivations much less the hidden agendas.
Also, while of course technological advances are a big theme in 1984, we do well to remember that thought control has been operating with varying degrees of success by all the worlds religions ... some more successfully than others.
The threat to individual freedom is not necessarily from the most obvious source.
A world is born again that never dies.
- My Home by Clive James
- StephenKingman
- Posts: 13994
- Joined: 29 Dec 2009, 12:00
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-stephenkingman.html
@ Fran, good point regarding people and their priorities. This could quite easily be the most apolitical generation there ever was, particulary in Ireland where we sit back and accept huge pay cuts and tax burdens just so the rich can stay rich, we complain till we are blue in the face but not enough of us have the will to do anythign about it. A depressing number of people, especially the young, just live for the next party or Facebook update and are totally blind to the evil and corruption around their whole lives, thus making it even easier for the media and government to feed them a heap of lies and dress it up as "business as usual". 1984 got one thing right- Big Brother is an omnipresent force. A good or bad force? Well thats food for thought.
- StephenKingman
- Posts: 13994
- Joined: 29 Dec 2009, 12:00
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-stephenkingman.html
- Maud Fitch
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: 28 Feb 2011, 23:05
- Favorite Book: The Eyre Affair
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Not everyone has the eloquence of an honours graduate. Or could it be that e-technology is already segregating us into literate 'haves' and 'have nots'? Are we our own Big Brother filters?Artdude wrote:Firstly, I have to say that I'm glad that this post generated some enthusiasm over the usual "I suppose it's alright" kind of response to most things on this site.
- Fran
- Posts: 28072
- Joined: 10 Aug 2009, 12:46
- Favorite Book: Anna Karenina
- Currently Reading: Hide and Seek
- Bookshelf Size: 1208
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fran.html
- Reading Device: B00I15SB16
Goes back to my point about the inability to concentrate for more than 30secs ... indepth immersion in a topic is IMHO being bred out of the human race (a bit like the good old appendix). In a few generations human beings will not be capable of communicating in more than 140 characters & indepth analysis will go the way of the dinosaurs.Maud Fitch wrote:Not everyone has the eloquence of an honours graduate. Or could it be that e-technology is already segregating us into literate 'haves' and 'have nots'? Are we our own Big Brother filters?Artdude wrote:Firstly, I have to say that I'm glad that this post generated some enthusiasm over the usual "I suppose it's alright" kind of response to most things on this site.
I tell you Maud, the end is nigh
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon/sad.gif)
A world is born again that never dies.
- My Home by Clive James
-
- Posts: 369
- Joined: 16 Feb 2011, 04:53
- Bookshelf Size: 0
I believe technology is the most important and superior aspect which will completely transform our society (to the point where currency will be obsolete). And yet, as any and pretty much all things, it can be misused and misinterpreted - which often happens in 2011.
1984 (and similar books for that matter) should be taken and thrown into faces of everyone who thinks Orwell's talking about utopian nonsense. What we need to do is employ a massive change in education rather quickly, because right now we're balancing between modern humans and controlled sheep...
- Artdude
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 01 Mar 2011, 15:08
- Bookshelf Size: 0
I didn't intend to cause offence. It was just nice to really discuss something. I didn't mean to seperate anyoneMaud Fitch wrote:Not everyone has the eloquence of an honours graduate. Or could it be that e-technology is already segregating us into literate 'haves' and 'have nots'? Are we our own Big Brother filters?Artdude wrote:Firstly, I have to say that I'm glad that this post generated some enthusiasm over the usual "I suppose it's alright" kind of response to most things on this site.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon/smile.gif)