The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand
Authors and publishers are not able to post replies in the review topics.
- Jolie_Ijaz
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 14 Jun 2012, 23:47
- Bookshelf Size: 0
The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand
I treat my copy of this book almost as well as I maintain my collection of religious texts, no joke.
Objectivism has taken on a prophetic and divinatory role in my life.
The Fountainhead models an extreme way of life for the man whose end is happiness. Though I agree with most of the conditions, there were some that I did not agree with:
1) Altruism. Rand exerts that everyone is capable of levying their own situation financially (as exhibited by both Howard Roark and Gail Wynand).
2) Religion keeps man from reaching his full potential.
Other than that, the guidelines developed throughout the novel are dependable. My favorite is Howard Roark’s refusal to compromise his work. I know realistically in the business world, it’s difficult to take on such risks. Maybe it’s even a little foolish. But I think it says a great deal about integrity and what will benefit the work at the end.
From a literature perspective, the novel keeps the reader interested through all sorts of twists. The characters are well-developed, very 3-dimensional.
The psychology behind the characters is amazing (such as Ellsworth Toohey’s use of ideas to control minds and Peter Keating’s eventual destruction).
The juxtaposing thoughts of Dominique Francon would often throw me off which I really loved.
The whole novel is written in a clever and entertaining way. This is my first Ayn Rand novel. I am looking forward to the others.
- Fran
- Posts: 28072
- Joined: 10 Aug 2009, 12:46
- Favorite Book: Anna Karenina
- Currently Reading: Hide and Seek
- Bookshelf Size: 1208
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fran.html
- Reading Device: B00I15SB16
A world is born again that never dies.
- My Home by Clive James
- jadestar31
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 31 Aug 2012, 15:16
- Bookshelf Size: 288
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jadestar31.html
- Phoenix98
- Posts: 381
- Joined: 22 Sep 2012, 00:08
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Her understanding of altruism is deadly accurate. With one exception, no genuine altruist has ever lived. (As an atheist, Rand would disagree with that assessment.) "Enlightened self-interest" is the closest any of us achieve in the arena of altruism. It is her conviction that Capitalism alone gives expression to an altruistic way of life.
Jolie_Ijaz, I agree with you that she is mistaken about the role of religion. I have to remind myself of her flight from Communism, and of the very likely possibility that its hatred of all forms of religion made an impression on her young mind that she could not shake.
- Jolie_Ijaz
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 14 Jun 2012, 23:47
- Bookshelf Size: 0
You said that, "It is her conviction that Capitalism alone gives expression to an altruistic way of life."
For me, capitalism and altruism seem to be on opposite sides of the spectrum.
In The Fountainhead, the only times the path between the two connected was when Roark created work that was wholly unmotivated by self-interest. And I can't seem to attribute his lack of self-interest to capitalism really.
- Phoenix98
- Posts: 381
- Joined: 22 Sep 2012, 00:08
- Bookshelf Size: 0
My statement would better have been something like: "She believes that Capitalism alone can achieve the results that altruism touts." In reality, she has nothing but contempt for altruism because it is a dead end to every form of human progress. Its inevitable outcome is misery, taking the form of socialism or fascism.
I agree with her in principle. The evidence tells me that the political and social theorists who espouse "sharing the wealth" and "evening the playing field" are motivated by power, not by genuine human concern.
Here's a quote from Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal:
What is the moral code of altruism? The basic principle of altruism is that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that service to others is the only justification of his existence, and that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, virtue and value.
Do not confuse altruism with kindness, good will or respect for the rights of others. These are not primaries, but consequences, which, in fact, altruism makes impossible. The irreducible primary of altruism, the basic absolute, is self-sacrifice—which means; self-immolation, self-abnegation, self-denial, self-destruction—which means: the self as a standard of evil, the selfless as a standard of the good.
Do not hide behind such superficialities as whether you should or should not give a dime to a beggar. That is not the issue. The issue is whether you do or do not have the right to exist without giving him that dime. The issue is whether you must keep buying your life, dime by dime, from any beggar who might choose to approach you. The issue is whether the need of others is the first mortgage on your life and the moral purpose of your existence. The issue is whether man is to be regarded as a sacrificial animal. Any man of self-esteem will answer: 'No.' Altruism says: 'Yes.'
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: 04 Aug 2012, 14:47
- Favorite Book: The Fountainhead
- Currently Reading: The Stranger Beside me by Ann Rule
- Bookshelf Size: 6
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fitzml.html
- Latest Review: "Maggie Magdalene" by James Byron Huggins
If you liked this book, you might also enjoy We The Living. This is the closest to an autobiographical work of Ayn Rand's and, in my view, better explains her philosophical foundation than any of her non-fictional work. Also, the protagonists are more realistic than those in The Fountainhead, which were much more idealized.
- Kehvex
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 11 Jan 2016, 08:09
- Bookshelf Size: 9
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-kehvex.html
- Latest Review: "Solaris Seethes (Solaris Saga book 1)" by Janet McNulty
- Reading Device: B00UB76290
Jolie_Ijaz wrote:Phoenix98,
You said that, "It is her conviction that Capitalism alone gives expression to an altruistic way of life."
For me, capitalism and altruism seem to be on opposite sides of the spectrum.
In The Fountainhead, the only times the path between the two connected was when Roark created work that was wholly unmotivated by self-interest. And I can't seem to attribute his lack of self-interest to capitalism really.
I am about to start this book and am glad to hear about how you all have enjoyed throughout your lives.
now in consideration of the quote, i think, based on my experiences through life. that what is most commonly considered altruism is not as we think it means. As has been quoted before this post. with what ayn rand has said. it does not concern you whether or not to be giving to others, i like to think that most generous deeds are done out of a shelfish act of attempting to impress some "other". if this being a higher power, or some great authority in your life.
what we think is good for others may be what is bad for them. what we think is good for us to do in certain situations may in fact be the wrong thing to do. what i like to think of altruism is that it is not the reasoned thought that has decided that "yes, this is good to do. ill give this man a dime, because i am a good person, and that is what people like me do".
Altruism, is the non-thinking act of well-being for someone other than yourself. you don't think about it. you do. it is something that is commonly rare. it is those genuine smiles and hellos to strangers. it is helping some one clean up a mess. it is the expectation from one party to think of some future compensation. that by doing such acts it would bring about a certain response in their world around them in their life. it is this self-interest motivation why we do most things in our lives.
it is through the malleability of the capitalistic world that allows for such ideas and actions to take place i think,
but yeah that is what i think of your post.