Sentence Structure Help
Moderator: Official Reviewer Representatives
- literaturelover
- Posts: 61
- Joined: 07 Oct 2015, 22:42
- Currently Reading: Chances
- Bookshelf Size: 146
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-literaturelover.html
- Latest Review: "Red Romeo" by Peter Bernhardt
- Reading Device: B00IKPYKWG
Sentence Structure Help
If I could use one word to describe how this book made me feel, it would be: terrifying.
It just doesn't look or feel right. This is the sentence I want to use, just not sure about the comma and colon placement. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated, thank you.
Jane Austen
- DATo
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 5796
- Joined: 31 Dec 2011, 07:54
- Bookshelf Size: 0
― Steven Wright
- Fran
- Posts: 28072
- Joined: 10 Aug 2009, 12:46
- Favorite Book: Anna Karenina
- Currently Reading: Hide and Seek
- Bookshelf Size: 1208
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fran.html
- Reading Device: B00I15SB16
A world is born again that never dies.
- My Home by Clive James
- bookowlie
- Special Discussion Leader
- Posts: 9071
- Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 09:52
- Favorite Book: The Lost Continent
- Currently Reading: The Night She Went Missing
- Bookshelf Size: 442
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-bookowlie.html
- Latest Review: To Paint A Murder by E. J. Gandolfo
it would be "terrifying"
OR
it would be...terrifying
- moderntimes
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 13:03
- Favorite Book: Ulysses by James Joyce
- Currently Reading: Grendel by John Gardner
- Bookshelf Size: 0
One word describes how I felt when reading this book: terrified.
Using the phrase "If I could use..." creates a detachment from the spirit of this strong statement. It puts things into past perfect or past tense which is less powerful than present tense. Tense is critical when setting the pace and rhythm of a sentence, paragraph, or chapter.
Use past tense to impart a slight detachment and slow the pace, present tense to create more urgency and directness. And use past perfect sparingly in modern fiction. It's okay for nonfiction but for fiction, especially genre fiction, it's a bit passe. Just my opinion.
- literaturelover
- Posts: 61
- Joined: 07 Oct 2015, 22:42
- Currently Reading: Chances
- Bookshelf Size: 146
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-literaturelover.html
- Latest Review: "Red Romeo" by Peter Bernhardt
- Reading Device: B00IKPYKWG
Jane Austen
- DennisK
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 470
- Joined: 12 Jun 2015, 19:00
- Currently Reading: Light in August
- Bookshelf Size: 39
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dennisk.html
- Reading Device: B00L89V1AA
“For another thing, flying home meant her father rising at three in the morning, driving a hundred miles to meet her in Mobile, and doing a full day's work afterwards: he was seventy-two now and this was no longer fair.”
I would have expected a semicolon or a period where she used a colon. I had no problem understanding her structure, so if it works …. it works! I have no problem understand your sentence. The colon, or dash, or a string of periods all lend an emphasis on the word “terrified” which I imagine you would want. Of course, this is simply my opinion.
- moderntimes
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 13:03
- Favorite Book: Ulysses by James Joyce
- Currently Reading: Grendel by John Gardner
- Bookshelf Size: 0
There are rules for formal composition, such as literate essays and writing created under the jurisdiction of professors who themselves were educated on 19th century literature. Which is fine for an essay or a formal piece.
But things have changed. Modern English literature, particularly fiction, and particularly genre fiction (fantasy, SF, romance, mystery, etc) has much less stipulative rules. I for example never never never use a semicolon. I think semicolons belong in a museum, ha ha. Instead I write 2 short sentences.
Don't forget that Harper Lee was essentially writing a 20th century novel using 19th century rules.
Regarding commas, they affect the rhythm and pacing of a paragraph or sentence. If you use more commas, the pacing is slowed down for more contemplative passages. Or if you omit commas, the pacing is more rapid for perhaps an action sequence.
Modern English fiction breaks all sorts of "ruies" -- you see one word paragraphs. One word sentences. And so on. Modifying English composition from the rigid rules and bending those rules is just one tool which the modern writer has. Use them sparingly and with focus, but you'll find that you can adjust the mood and rhythm of a paragraph by modifying the older formal rules.
- literaturelover
- Posts: 61
- Joined: 07 Oct 2015, 22:42
- Currently Reading: Chances
- Bookshelf Size: 146
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-literaturelover.html
- Latest Review: "Red Romeo" by Peter Bernhardt
- Reading Device: B00IKPYKWG
I do enjoy being compared to an icon.DennisK wrote:Your use of the colon reminds me of Harper Lee's use of that punctuation. When reading her book, Go Set a Watchman, I was surprised by her frequent use of it. As an example:
“For another thing, flying home meant her father rising at three in the morning, driving a hundred miles to meet her in Mobile, and doing a full day's work afterwards: he was seventy-two now and this was no longer fair.”
I would have expected a semicolon or a period where she used a colon. I had no problem understanding her structure, so if it works …. it works! I have no problem understand your sentence. The colon, or dash, or a string of periods all lend an emphasis on the word “terrified” which I imagine you would want. Of course, this is simply my opinion.
Unfortunately, my school was left with slim pickings when it came to English teachers. I spent my entire Junior High and High School either learning about Greek Gods (? haha WTF right) or helping the teacher plan her son's wedding. I managed to BS my way through college, but technical writing is giving me hell.
Thanks for the help everyone, I am really enjoying this community!
Jane Austen
- moderntimes
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 13:03
- Favorite Book: Ulysses by James Joyce
- Currently Reading: Grendel by John Gardner
- Bookshelf Size: 0
So yeah, I know tech writing.
- literaturelover
- Posts: 61
- Joined: 07 Oct 2015, 22:42
- Currently Reading: Chances
- Bookshelf Size: 146
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-literaturelover.html
- Latest Review: "Red Romeo" by Peter Bernhardt
- Reading Device: B00IKPYKWG
Jane Austen
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: 21 Oct 2015, 13:15
- Bookshelf Size: 15
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-stanley.html
- Latest Review: "Return to the Go-Go" by William Peskett
- moderntimes
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 13:03
- Favorite Book: Ulysses by James Joyce
- Currently Reading: Grendel by John Gardner
- Bookshelf Size: 0
There's of course nothing wrong with the original sentence technically, which calls into mind the whole element of the English language and how writers can use it to create a certain movement.
I'm always reminded of how Shakespeare used the language, with a mixture of the romantic influence of Old French and the more abrupt rhythm of Anglo-Saxon. One sentence from Hamlet desribes this perfectly, when Hamlet is speaking to Yorick's skull (I may get this wrong because I'm quoting from memory but here it is)
"Go thou to my lady's chamber and bade her to paint an inch thick."
Hamlet is of course speaking of his mother and her marriage to Claudius. But look how he does it -- he uses the more "poetic" phrasing of one side of English -- Old French -- with the "go thou and "bade" and then he abruptly ends it with the sharp "inch thick" which refers to his mother's pretend romance to Claudius. And the quick single-syllable "inch thick" provides a great contrast.
Such are the vagaries and the great resources of modern English.
We, as modern writers, can use all this to effect a certain rhythm and texture to what we say. This is what makes a standard and rather boring exposition into a piece of linear poetry.
Many new writers, especially those of romances, may use "fluffy" speech and tend to write via 19th century structures. There's nothing wrong with this generically. But what may really create a sterling narrative is if the author mixes this with the more abbreative style of late 20th & 21st century style -- a blend of, if you will, Faulkner with Hemingway.
So the original post was of course not wrong at all. But what may have been missing would maybe be the rhythm and pacing which can be employed by a writer to create a sense of mood, whether short and abrupt or more sedate.
This is very tricky and believe me, in my 3 novels, I worked constantly to perfect. There are likely 30 ways for the original sentence to be written. Each of them however has a certain "feel" and this is something which a writer must strive for, the texture and rhythm of such.
- Goms
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 18 Feb 2016, 03:49
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-goms.html
What about: 'If I could explain how this book made me fell, it would be - terror.
Note: The dash here is an em dash by the way. Hope this helps.
- moderntimes
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 13:03
- Favorite Book: Ulysses by James Joyce
- Currently Reading: Grendel by John Gardner
- Bookshelf Size: 0