New review team page
Moderator: Official Reviewer Representatives
- Scott
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4068
- Joined: 31 Jul 2006, 23:00
- Currently Reading: The Unbound Soul
- Bookshelf Size: 340
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-scott.html
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Publishing Contest Votes: 960
Re: New review team page
I suspect that some of the issues we have had in the past with trying to balance the availability of reviews with the demand to join the review team have already been alleviated with a moderate increase in the proofreading and quality standards for reviews, thanks to the editors.
-- 17 Mar 2015 12:19 pm --
One thing I have been considering is adding the option for reviewers to earn some temporary 'bonus points' to their score, maybe in the range of 5-20 points for doing things like completing their profile on the forums (i.e. uploading a custom avatar, signature, etc.).
Another change I made is that when a new review is published a 'latest review' link is added below the signature of that person. I'm hoping this will help reviewers who are quality participants in the community get higher popularity scores--under the thought that other members will think to themselves this person seems cool, I'd like to read their latest review for which I see a link right here.
"Non ignara mali miseris succurrere disco." Virgil, The Aeneid
- bluemel4
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 5222
- Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 14:43
- Currently Reading: The Dark Tower, Books 1-3
- Bookshelf Size: 466
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-bluemel4.html
- Latest Review: "Severed Threads" by Kaylin McFarren
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Scott
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4068
- Joined: 31 Jul 2006, 23:00
- Currently Reading: The Unbound Soul
- Bookshelf Size: 340
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-scott.html
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Publishing Contest Votes: 960
"Non ignara mali miseris succurrere disco." Virgil, The Aeneid
- bluemel4
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 5222
- Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 14:43
- Currently Reading: The Dark Tower, Books 1-3
- Bookshelf Size: 466
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-bluemel4.html
- Latest Review: "Severed Threads" by Kaylin McFarren
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- ALynnPowers
- Posts: 8536
- Joined: 21 Aug 2014, 07:14
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 417
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-alynnpowers.html
- Latest Review: Sarah's Dream by Eileen Bird
- Reading Device: B0051QVF7A
- Publishing Contest Votes: 13
- Scott
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4068
- Joined: 31 Jul 2006, 23:00
- Currently Reading: The Unbound Soul
- Bookshelf Size: 340
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-scott.html
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Publishing Contest Votes: 960
Thanks for noticing!bluemel4 wrote:Scott you are the best!
Well, since you have over seven thousand posts it should be.ALynnPowers wrote:I think this might be my favorite addition to the site!
"Non ignara mali miseris succurrere disco." Virgil, The Aeneid
- PashaRu
- Posts: 9174
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014, 17:02
- Currently Reading: Vicars of Christ - The Dark Side of the Papacy
- Bookshelf Size: 191
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-pasharu.html
- Latest Review: "Damn Females on the Lawn" by Rachel Hurd
- Janiac02
- Posts: 190
- Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 10:37
- Favorite Book: Pride and Prejudice
- Currently Reading: After Cilmeri Series
- Bookshelf Size: 38
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-janiac02.html
- Latest Review: "A Cold Wind" by C. J. Brightley
I really love that idea! I appreciate all of the help I can getScott wrote: Another change I made is that when a new review is published a 'latest review' link is added below the signature of that person. I'm hoping this will help reviewers who are quality participants in the community get higher popularity scores--under the thought that other members will think to themselves this person seems cool, I'd like to read their latest review for which I see a link right here.
- Scott
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4068
- Joined: 31 Jul 2006, 23:00
- Currently Reading: The Unbound Soul
- Bookshelf Size: 340
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-scott.html
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Publishing Contest Votes: 960
"Non ignara mali miseris succurrere disco." Virgil, The Aeneid
- Ryan
- Posts: 15342
- Joined: 08 Sep 2014, 19:11
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 444
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ryan.html
I have a few questions regarding editorial work.
1) I've noticed that one particular reviewer's reviews have been very steadily improving so that their scores have moved from a 4 to, most recently, a 6 (I know this because I've rated nearly all of them). This is so great to see and I wondered whether, after discussing the monthly awards some time ago, there might be one for most improved reviewer? I know there has been some issues recently regarding the progress of members going unnoticed and this would offer a solution to that problem.
2) In reviews there might be spelling/grammatical/punctuation errors but the review generally might be very insightful and interesting, so I don't feel comfortable marking it down when its content is otherwise great. Is there any way to separate the score from a reviewer's decision to have it published or not? For example, a drop-down menu from which to choose "to be published" or "not to be published" and if the latter is selected the editor can explain why while also providing feedback in the current way. This means that reviews are given the best rating possible on condition that they make certain changes and once these changes are made they can re-submit and the review can be published with that rating. Of course, this might need to be tweaked, but I just wondered what everybody thought. I know this relates to a much smaller number of people.
- Scott
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4068
- Joined: 31 Jul 2006, 23:00
- Currently Reading: The Unbound Soul
- Bookshelf Size: 340
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-scott.html
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Publishing Contest Votes: 960
I am not fond of the idea of having reviews rewritten. If the guidelines were not followed, I would like someone else to do the review following the guidelines the whole time. A big part of the issue here is that I am not counting on the editor process to find and correct every little thing to make it a great review, but rather I want the editor process to simply double-check that the review was done according to the standards. I want to make sure we are delivering a high quality service to the authors and publishers who gives us free copies of their books for review.
"Non ignara mali miseris succurrere disco." Virgil, The Aeneid
- Ryan
- Posts: 15342
- Joined: 08 Sep 2014, 19:11
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 444
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ryan.html
Understood, sir!Scott wrote:I think I want to change the reviewer scoring formula to make more recent reviews count more towards the editorial analysis score than older reviews. That way members will not have their score dragged down by a few low scored reviews done at first when they are still getting used to everything, once they do a couple well-rated reviews.
I am not fond of the idea of having reviews rewritten. If the guidelines were not followed, I would like someone else to do the review following the guidelines the whole time. A big part of the issue here is that I am not counting on the editor process to find and correct every little thing to make it a great review, but rather I want the editor process to simply double-check that the review was done according to the standards. I want to make sure we are delivering a high quality service to the authors and publishers who gives us free copies of their books for review.
Good idea about making newer reviews have more input
- bookowlie
- Special Discussion Leader
- Posts: 9071
- Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 09:52
- Favorite Book: The Lost Continent
- Currently Reading: The Night She Went Missing
- Bookshelf Size: 442
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-bookowlie.html
- Latest Review: To Paint A Murder by E. J. Gandolfo
Here's my 2 cents about these issues:Scott wrote:I think I want to change the reviewer scoring formula to make more recent reviews count more towards the editorial analysis score than older reviews. That way members will not have their score dragged down by a few low scored reviews done at first when they are still getting used to everything, once they do a couple well-rated reviews.
I am not fond of the idea of having reviews rewritten. If the guidelines were not followed, I would like someone else to do the review following the guidelines the whole time. A big part of the issue here is that I am not counting on the editor process to find and correct every little thing to make it a great review, but rather I want the editor process to simply double-check that the review was done according to the standards. I want to make sure we are delivering a high quality service to the authors and publishers who gives us free copies of their books for review.
I have mixed feelings about the scoring formula possibly changed to give more weight to more recent reviews. I agree with the reasons you posted. However, there are some books that are just a bit difficult to summarize and review, no matter how experienced the reviewer is. In these cases, the reviewer's overall score would be disproportionately lowered under the proposed scoring formula.
As for the proposal of having reviews rewritten, I agree with Scott. I am not a fan. I don't think the editors should have to basically suggest rewrites of a review in order for the review to become acceptable for publication. It's true that editors do give suggestions, including grammatical changes, rewording confusing sections, etc. However, the ultimate goal is for the authors to be given high quality reviews.
-- 22 Mar 2015, 20:56 --
I hope my observations don't come across as overly harsh.
- Ryan
- Posts: 15342
- Joined: 08 Sep 2014, 19:11
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 444
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ryan.html
- Janiac02
- Posts: 190
- Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 10:37
- Favorite Book: Pride and Prejudice
- Currently Reading: After Cilmeri Series
- Bookshelf Size: 38
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-janiac02.html
- Latest Review: "A Cold Wind" by C. J. Brightley