Are the classics overrated?

Use this forum for book and reading discussion that doesn't fall into another category. Talk about books, genres, reading issues, general literature, and any other topic of particular interest to readers. If you want to start a thread about a specific book or a specific series, please do that in the section below this one.
Post Reply
Annelore Trujillo
In It Together VIP
Posts: 592
Joined: 29 May 2016, 22:01
Currently Reading: Strong Heart
Bookshelf Size: 170
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-annelore-trujillo.html
Latest Review: The Siberians by Simon J. Carey

Are the classics overrated?

Post by Annelore Trujillo »

What is it about the classics that make them classics? Do you ever think that the classics are overrated? Do you like reading classics?

I've read quite a few classics and I just can't get into them. I don't know what it is about them.

What are your thoughts?
User avatar
brendabowman89
Posts: 13
Joined: 17 Jun 2016, 06:49
Currently Reading: Les Miserables
Bookshelf Size: 48
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-brendabowman89.html
Reading Device: B00IKPYKWG

Post by brendabowman89 »

I have read a few of the classics that people often talk about. While I feel that some of them are wonderful and I can understand that they are called classic for a reason, there are others that I simply can't get into. I love being able to read a book that is incredibly old and has been passed down from generation to generation but still has the staying power to cause readers years from the time it was produced to be wrapped up in the story and fall in love with the characters. Unfortunately I find that many of the classics are written in unusual English and can be hard to understand, or they have so much detail and history that it makes the story seem to drag. It seems we are always in a hurry, even when doing something as relaxing as enjoying a book and that it makes it hard to not just "give up" on the book or skip through the "boring" parts to finish. Many of them are beautifully written and tell a fascinating story, but I feel that too much detail is boring and distracting to a reader. The fact that the classics have stood the test of time makes them classics and I think that they do deserve to have that title, but not every book is for everyone and just because some people like myself may not be able to get into them I don't think that is reason enough to say that they are overrated.
User avatar
DATo
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 5797
Joined: 31 Dec 2011, 07:54
Bookshelf Size: 0

Post by DATo »

No, I do not think that classics are overrated. Classics are classics because they have stood the test of time. What they say and how they say it has appealed to people over many generations. There are "best sellers" today that will be forgotten 100 years from now, but a book of extraordinary quality will endure.
“I just got out of the hospital. I was in a speed reading accident. I hit a book mark and flew across the room.”
― Steven Wright
User avatar
Pipermaru82
Posts: 10
Joined: 20 Jun 2016, 22:18
Bookshelf Size: 0
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-pipermaru82.html

Post by Pipermaru82 »

I don't think the classics are overrated either. I love reading most of the classics, with some exceptions.
User avatar
MsMartha
Posts: 536
Joined: 27 Nov 2015, 13:41
Currently Reading: Collected Works of Algernon Blackwood (Unabridged)
Bookshelf Size: 99
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-msmartha.html
Latest Review: "9 Realities of Caring for an Elderly Parent" by Stefania Shaffer
Reading Device: B00IKPYKWG

Post by MsMartha »

DATo wrote:There are "best sellers" today that will be forgotten 100 years from now, but a book of extraordinary quality will endure.
Sometimes these old best sellers are really interesting. I belong to a group that reads 19th century books. Most of the time we do read classics,but once in awhile someone will suggest a book that the rest of us never heard of. Research often shows that the book was a best seller in its time, and these are also often very enjoyable.
Latest Review: "9 Realities of Caring for an Elderly Parent" by Stefania Shaffer
Sarah_Khan
Posts: 869
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 11:56
Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 3700">Gone With the Wind</a>
Currently Reading: Circe
Bookshelf Size: 336
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sarah-khan.html
Latest Review: The Formidable King by Alyssa J. Montgomery

Post by Sarah_Khan »

I've read a lot of classics and for the most part after reading them I can understand why they became classics, most of them have unforgettable characters or plots that have inspired numerous other books or movies. But with that said, I have come across a classic or two that I can't seem to like no matter how many times I read it.
User avatar
annelamb
Posts: 7
Joined: 21 Jun 2016, 14:02
Bookshelf Size: 0
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-annelamb.html

Post by annelamb »

I have enjoyed most of the classics that I have read!
User avatar
Sakuko
Posts: 22
Joined: 22 Jun 2016, 06:01
Bookshelf Size: 0

Post by Sakuko »

I enjoy a lot of classics, though I don't feel like I need to like all of them. I don't like all current books either, and since classic can mean any genre there are just some I enjoy more than others.

In some classics I can appreciate the social criticism or portrait or some other technical aspect, even when I don't find them entertaining, and some I just feel have lost their relevance.
Scerakor
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 2146
Joined: 13 May 2013, 13:43
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 315
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-scerakor.html
Latest Review: Gaslighting & Narcissistic Abuse Recovery: by Don Barlow

Post by Scerakor »

I think that there are some which have gained a certain popularity by being a classic. By no means does this mean that everyone should like any book that has stood the test of time and is still considered a "classic". I often come across posts where the OP is asking "What is X considered a classic", "Why does everyone think Y is so good?", and "Is Z overrated?". I think people don't realise that classics are subject to the same levels of admiration as new books are nowadays. You like some, you dislike others.
User avatar
AliceofX
Posts: 351
Joined: 27 Feb 2017, 06:01
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 361
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-aliceofx.html
Latest Review: The Demon of Decay by Alex C. Gates
Reading Device: B00ICPVSYC

Post by AliceofX »

From my own journey into the classics I'd say the concept of them might be overrated. In the end they're just books. Some you'll love, some you'll hate. Being influential and enduring doesn't automatically make it good. I know some people get very snobbish about them, and I kind of used to be like that, but if it's not your thing you shouldn't feel bad about it.
User avatar
Yolanda Denise
Posts: 30
Joined: 14 Mar 2017, 16:15
Currently Reading: In the Fullness of Time
Bookshelf Size: 5
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-yolanda-denise.html

Post by Yolanda Denise »

I don't think the classics are overrated at all. They are very popular for good reasons, but overrated? No.
Post Reply

Return to “General Book & Reading Discussion”